Considerations in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Renal and Ureteric Calculi: A Bicenter Quality Control Study |
| |
| Authors: | Saskia Weltings Hossain Roshani Joost Leenarts Rob Pelger |
| |
| Affiliation: | aDepartment of urology, Hagaziekenhuis, Leiden, Netherlands;bDepartment of MC Haaglanden, The Hague, Leiden, Netherlands;cDepartment of Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands |
| |
| Abstract: | ![]()
BackgroundThe use of minimally invasive surgery is increasing. Evaluating the quality of care brings new sights in the optimization of operating techniques.MethodsWe included all procedures performed in two hospitals during 2010 and 2011. A total of 264 patients were included in the ureterorenoscopy (URS) group and 77 patients in the percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL) group. Data were gathered by retrospectively reviewing medical records.ResultsMean stone diameter in the URS group was 9 mm. Patients suffered from a single stone in 79% of the cases. Calculi in the distal ureter, defined as the part of the ureter below the lower border of the sacroiliac joint, were most likely to be removed. A stone-free status was reached in 69% of the cases using URS. Mean stone diameter in the PCNL group was 23 mm. PCNL was successful in 70% of the cases in Haga Hospital versus 53% in Medisch Centrum Haaglanden. Incidence of complications was comparable between the hospitals (p = 0.5). Outcome and quality of both PCNL and URS was not influenced by sex, age or body mass index.ConclusionThe clinical results were comparable with results in the literature. Further improvement can be made by optimization of technical aspects and centralization of treatment by urologists experienced in minimally invasive techniques.Key Words: Urolithiasis, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Ureterorenoscopy, Minimally invasive surgery |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
