Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Splenectomy Versus Open Splenectomy for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

The long-term outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) versus open splenectomy (OS) in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) are not known. A retrospective analysis of 73 patients who underwent splenectomy (32 LS and 41 OS) for refractory ITP between April 2003 and June 2012 was conducted. LS was associated with shorter hospital stay (P = 0.01), less blood loss and blood transfusion during surgery, quicker resumption of oral diet (P < 0.0001), and earlier drain removal (P < 0.01). Conversion to OS was required in 4 patients (12.5%). Operation time was significantly longer in LS (P < 0.0001). Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was observed in 1 patient after LS and in 4 patients after OS (P = 0.52). One patient died from intraperitoneal bleeding after OS, another patient developed pulmonary embolism. Median follow-up of 36 months was performed in LS group (29 of 32, 91%) and of 46 months in OS group (35 of 41, 85%), 25 patients (86%) in LS group and 32 (91%) in OS group reached sustained complete response (P = 0.792). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the relapse-free survival rate between the groups (P = 0.777). In conclusion, the long-term outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy is not different from that of open splenectomy for patients with ITP.Key words: Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, Splenectomy, Laparoscopy, Postsplenic complications, Relapse-free survival rateIdiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is related to increased platelet destruction along with reduced platelet production via the specific autoantibodies and may cause a potentially life-threatening hemorrhage. Most ITP can be managed medically, yet some patients are refractory to medical agents such as prednisone, or anti-D globulin therapy,¹ and require splenectomy. Splenectomy can be performed as open splenectomy (OS) or laparoscopic splenectomy (LS).^1,2In the past decade, LS has rapidly become recognized as the gold standard for the management of nontraumatic splenic disorders, such as ITP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and hemolytic anemia purpuras.^1–3 Systematic review studies have demonstrated a complete response or durable remission following splenectomy in 66% of adult patients with ITP.⁴ Several retrospective studies have compared the outcomes of OS and LS^1,5–7 and have shown comparable perioperative results, and the recent guidelines of the American Society of Hematology for ITP suggested that a similar efficacy is achieved with both LS and OS, the long-term efficacy of LS for this disorder is uncertain. Therefore, we have retrospectively studied 32 consecutive LS (LS group) and compared them with a historical control group of 41 consecutive OS (OS group) performed for ITP in order to compare the outcomes of LS with OS for ITP.