Intrusiveness of behavioral treatments for adults with intellectual disability |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. West Virginia University, United States;2. Texas Tech University, United States;3. East Tennessee State University, United States;1. Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada;2. School of Public Health & Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada;3. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada;4. Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man., Canada;5. Centre for Research on Safe Driving, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada;6. School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Que., Canada;7. Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain, Montreal, Que., Canada;8. Research Department, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont., Canada;9. Department of Medicine and Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Geriatric Health Care Centre, Toronto, Ont., Canada;10. Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada;11. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada;12. School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada;1. Institute of Behavioral Medicine, National ChengKung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan;2. Department of Psychology, National ChengKung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan;3. Department of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung Hospital, Medical College, National Cheng Kung University, No. 138, Sheng Li Road, Tainan City 70403, Taiwan;4. Department of Medicinal and Applied Chemistry, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;1. Department of Library and Information Science, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Information and Library Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA;1. Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie – Laboratoire Travail et Cognition (CLLE-LTC), UMR 5263, CNRS, Université de Toulouse Le Mirail, Toulouse, France;2. Université de Lyon, F-69622 Lyon, France;3. IFSTTAR, LESCOT, F-69675 Bron, France;4. Laboratoire d’Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EMC), EA 3082, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France |
| |
| Abstract: | The current study examined treatment intrusiveness within behavior intervention programs developed for adults with intellectual disability (ID). Behavior analysts provided demographic information about themselves, their adult clients with ID, and their clients’ behavior intervention plans, and they completed an online version of the Treatment Intrusiveness Measure (Carter et al., 2009), an instrument that provides a Base Level Intrusiveness Score (BLIS; a score computed across five areas of categorization, such as, Health and Safety) and a Modified Level of Intrusiveness Score (MLIS), which assesses the presence or absence of intrusiveness-reducing practices. Among other findings, various statistical analyses revealed (a) a significant difference between BLIS and modified (BLIS minus MLIS) intrusiveness scores, (b) the practices within which most of the intrusiveness was concentrated within behavioral treatment programs, and (c) the least- and most-utilized intrusiveness-reducing practices. Implications are provided to assist professionals working with adults with ID who engage in challenging behavior and are supported through behavior intervention services. |
| |
| Keywords: | Intellectual disability Treatment intrusiveness Behavior intervention |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
