Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Clinical Department of Head and Neck, School of Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy;2. Private Practice and Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Camaiore, Pisa, Italy;3. Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy;4. Complex Operating Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero – Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy;5. Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy;6. Maxillo-Facial Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy;1. Attending Surgeon and Chief, Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Instituto Neofacial, Badajoz, Spain;2. Attending Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Instituto Neofacial, Badajoz, Spain;3. Attending Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Instituto Neofacial, Badajoz, Spain;4. Attending Surgeon and Chief, Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Hospital Los Naranjos, Badajoz, Spain;1. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil;2. Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, USP, São Paulo, Brazil;1. Adjunct Professor, Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF-GV), Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil;2. Associate Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil;3. Researcher, Tridimensional Technology Division, Renato Archer''s Information Technology Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil;4. Researcher, Tridimensional Technology Division, Renato Archer''s Information Technology Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil;5. Professor, Department Prosthodontics, Presidente Prudente Dental School, University of the West of São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente, Brazil;6. PhD student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil;7. PhD student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil;8. Titular Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Bone quality and quantity are important factors with regard to the survival rate of dental implants. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of dental implants inserted in low-density bone and to determine the survival rate of dental implants with surface treatments over time. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken by two independent individuals; the Medline/PubMed database was searched for the period July 1975 to March 2013. Relevant reports on bone quality and osseointegration of dental implants were selected. The search retrieved 1018 references, and after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 studies were selected for review. A total of 3937 patients, who had received a total of 12,465 dental implants, were analyzed. The survival rates of dental implants according to the bone density were: type I, 97.6%; type II, 96.2%; type III, 96.5%; and type IV, 88.8%. The survival rate of treated surface implants inserted in low-density bone was higher (97.1%) than that of machined surface implants (91.6%). Surface-treated dental implants inserted in low-density bone have a high survival rate and may be indicated for oral rehabilitation. However, more randomized studies are required to better evaluate this issue. |
| |
Keywords: | dental implants alveolar bone implant-supported dental prosthesis randomized controlled trial |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|