首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

静脉注射右美托咪啶和咪唑安定对蛛网膜下隙阻滞麻醉效果的影响
引用本文:吴俊林,;蔡德波,;冯涛,;朱俊红. 静脉注射右美托咪啶和咪唑安定对蛛网膜下隙阻滞麻醉效果的影响[J]. 山西医科大学学报, 2014, 0(7): 654-657
作者姓名:吴俊林,  蔡德波,  冯涛,  朱俊红
作者单位:[1]武汉市黄陂区人民医院麻醉科,武汉430030; [2]湖北医药学院附属东风医院麻醉科,武汉430030;
摘    要:目的 比较静脉注射右美托咪啶和咪唑安定对蛛网膜下隙阻滞麻醉效果的影响. 方法 选择择期在蛛网膜下隙阻滞麻醉下行经尿道前列腺电切术患者90例(ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ级),随机分为3组:对照组(C组)、右美托咪啶组(D组)和咪唑安定(M组),每组30例.D组患者预先静脉泵注右美托咪啶0.5 μg/kg,M组患者预先静脉泵注咪唑安定0.05 mg/kg,C组则给予等容生理盐水10 ml.各组患者行蛛网膜下隙阻滞,均给予0.5%罗哌卡因2ml.比较各组患者一般情况;Ramsay镇静评分、感觉阻滞平面、感觉及运动阻滞恢复时间;术中低血压、心动过缓发生例数;术后首次要求使用镇痛药的时间及各组术后24h要求使用镇痛药物的例数. 结果 三组患者一般情况无明显差异;与C组比较,D组和M组镇静效果满意(P<0.05),而发生低血压、心动过缓副作用无明显差异(P>0.05);与M组比较,D组患者最高感觉阻滞平面明显增高(p<0.05),感觉阻滞恢复时间及术后首次要求使用镇痛药物的时间明显延长(P<0.05),术后24h要求使用镇痛药物的病例明显减少(P<0.05). 结论 蛛网膜下隙阻滞前单次剂量静脉注射右美托咪啶0.5 μg/kg和咪唑安定0.05 mg/kg均能产生良好的镇静效果;而相比咪唑安定,右美托咪啶能明显延长罗哌卡因引起的感觉阻滞时间,并具有较好的镇痛效果.

关 键 词:右美托咪啶  咪唑安定  蛛网膜下隙阻滞  镇静  镇痛

Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia
Affiliation:WU Junlin,CAI Debo,FENG Tao,ZHU Junhong(1.Department of Anesthesiology,Huangpi People's Hospital, Wuhan 430030, China;2.Department of Anesthesiology, Dongfeng Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine)
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.Methods Ninety patients (ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ) undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups:control group(C group),dexmedetomidire group(D group) and midazolam group (M group).Patients received intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg in D group and M group,respectively,while patients received intravenously the same volume of normal saline in D group.Then all patients underwent spinal anesthesia using 0.5% ropivacaine 2 ml.The sedation,side effects (hypotension and bradycardia),maximum upper level of sensory blockade,recovery time of sensory and motor blockade were recorded.Postoperative analgesic requirements were also recorded.Results The general condition of patients were similar among three groups.Compared with control group,the sedation scores in D group and M group were significantly increased (P < 0.05).Compared with M group,patients in D group showed similar sedation and side effects (P > 0.05),while the maximum upper level of sensory blockade and recovery time of sensory blockade were increased (P < 0.05),the time to first analgesia request increased,and the patients who required for analgesia decreased within 24 h after operation (P < 0.05).Conclusion Intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg both provide good sedation,while dexmedetomidine could have better effects than midazolam to increase spinal ropivacaine sensory blockade and decrease additional analgesia.
Keywords:dexmedetomidine  midazolam  spinal anesthesia  sedation  analgesia
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号