首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Moderne Ultraschalldiagnostik der Beinvenenthrombose bei unklarer Genese der Lungenembolie
Authors:Dr. D.-A. Clevert  E.M. Jung  K. Pfister  K. Stock  G. Schulte-Altedorneburg  C. Fink  D.-A. Clevert  M. Reiser
Affiliation:1. Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum Gro?hadern der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit?t München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
2. Institut für R?ntgendiagnostik, Univ.-Klinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Univ.-Klinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
4. II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, München, Deutschland
5. Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universit?tsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
6. Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Universit?tsklinikum Medizinische Fakult?t Mannheim der Universit?t Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
7. Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, Charité, Universit?tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We compared innovative ultrasound techniques such as tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and cross-beam technique with speckle reduction imaging (SRI) to conventional fundamental B scan in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated a total number of 185 patients with clinical symptoms of acute vein thrombosis. We documented the thrombosis in the patients using multifrequency ultrasound probes (5-7 MHz, 6-9 MHz, 9-14 MHz, Logig 9, GE) and recorded ultrasound sequences in fundamental B scan, THI, and cross-beam technique with SRI (grade 2). Three blinded ultrasound investigators ranked the marking of the thrombosis in each of these image modalities and graded them with the numbers 5 = weak, 4 = moderate, 3 = satisfactory, 2 = good, and 1 = excellent. We calculated the median and a t-test for each of these image modalities. RESULTS: We diagnosed 115 thromboses (62%) in 185 investigated patients. This group could be divided as follows: 11 patients (6%) with three-level thrombosis, 37 patients (20%) with two-level thrombosis, and 67 (36%) with one-level thrombosis. The one-level thrombosis group included five (3%) patients with muscle vein thromboses, seven (4%) cases of thrombophlebitis without involvement of the deep vein system, and three (2%) cases of thrombophlebitis with involvement of the deep vein system. The t-test for unconnected samples showed significant differences (p <0.05) in iliac veins and highly significant differences (p <0.001) in the veins of the lower extremity due to the superior capabilities for detection of thrombosis using the cross-beam technique with SRI compared to THI and the fundamental B scan. CONCLUSION: The use of high-resolution linear ultrasound probes with the concomitant application of THI and cross-beam technique with SRI facilitates the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. The employment of these new ultrasound modalities is an advantage in distinguishing the veins from the surrounding tissue structures and helps in evaluating the compressibility of venous vessels.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号