首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

急性心肌梗死患者的直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术与溶栓治疗疗效比较
引用本文:李传昶,蒲晓群,杨天伦,郑昭芬,欧阳淑其,余再新,陈凡,莫龙,蒋冬贵,邓金华,孟霜媛. 急性心肌梗死患者的直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术与溶栓治疗疗效比较[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2003, 11(4): 359-361
作者姓名:李传昶  蒲晓群  杨天伦  郑昭芬  欧阳淑其  余再新  陈凡  莫龙  蒋冬贵  邓金华  孟霜媛
作者单位:中南大学湘雅医院心内科,湖南省长沙市,410008
摘    要:
为探讨急性心肌梗死直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的安全性及临床疗效 ,选择 6 2例未经静脉和冠状动脉内溶栓治疗的急性心肌梗死患者 ,在紧急冠状动脉造影后即行直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术 ;另外选择 5 9例急性心肌梗死患者 ,采用溶栓治疗 ,溶栓治疗后不再接受介入治疗和外科冠状动脉搭桥 ,然后比较直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术和溶栓治疗的疗效、安全性及预后。结果发现 ,直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术组 6 0例再灌注成功 ,成功率为 96 .7% ,其中 4例合并心源性休克的患者均再灌注成功 ,血压回升 ,急性上消化道出血 1例 ,死亡率为 0 ;溶栓治疗组 38例再灌注成功 ,成功率为 6 4 .4 % ,住院期间死亡 5例 ,出院 6月内死亡 2例 ,急性上消化道出血 1例 ,血尿 1例 ,溶栓治疗后心源性休克 5例 ,死亡率为 1 1 .9%。直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术再灌注成功率明显高于溶栓治疗 ,死亡率和主要心脏事件的发生率明显低于溶栓治疗 (P <0 .0 1 )。结果提示 ,急性心肌梗死的直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术治疗安全有效 ,再灌注成功率明显高于溶栓治疗 ,疗效及预后优于溶栓治疗

关 键 词:内科学 直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术治疗急性心肌梗死 直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术 心肌梗死 溶栓治疗 再灌注 介入治疗
文章编号:1007-3949(2003)11-04-0359-03
收稿时间:2002-07-23
修稿时间:2002-07-23

Comparing the Therapeutic Effects of Direct Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolytic Therapy for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction
LI Chuan Chang,PU Xiao Qun,YANG Tian Lun,ZHENG Zhao Fen,OUYANG Shu Qi,YU Zai Xin,CHEN Fan,MO Long,JIANG Dong Gui,DENG Jin Hu,and MENG Shuang Yuan. Comparing the Therapeutic Effects of Direct Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolytic Therapy for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction[J]. Chinese Journal of Arteriosclerosis, 2003, 11(4): 359-361
Authors:LI Chuan Chang  PU Xiao Qun  YANG Tian Lun  ZHENG Zhao Fen  OUYANG Shu Qi  YU Zai Xin  CHEN Fan  MO Long  JIANG Dong Gui  DENG Jin Hu  and MENG Shuang Yuan
Affiliation:Department of Cardiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China
Abstract:
Aim To evaluate the safety and therapeutic effects of direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and compare the effects vs thrombolytic therapy. Methods 62 AMI patients without thrombolytic therapy were treated by direct PTCA after urgent coronary angiography, 59 AMI patients were treated by thrombolytic therapy. The safety and therapeutic effects of direct PTCA were studied and compared with thrombolytic therapy. Results In direct PTCA group, 60 cases were reperfused (96.7%), among which 4 were complicated with cardiogenic shock and the blood pressure raised to normal, 1 case was complicated with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, no mortality; whereas, in thrombolytic treatment group, 38 cases were reperfused (64.4%), 5 died in hospital and 2 died after discharge; 1 patient complicated with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 1 with hematuria and 5 with cardiogenic shock; the motality was 11.9%. The rate of reperfusion in direct PTCA group was higher than that of thrombolytic therapy group; meanwhile, the incidence of major cardiac events in direct PTCA group was significantly lower than that of thrombolytic therapy (P<0.01). Conclusions Direct PTCA for treatment of AMI was safe and effective; the rate of reperfusion after direct PTCA was higher than that of thrombolytic therapy; thus, the therapeutic effects and the prognosis of direct PTCA was better than those of thrombolytic therapy.
Keywords:Direct Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty  Myocardial Infarction  Thrombolytic Therapy  Reperfusion  Interventional Therapy
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国动脉硬化杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国动脉硬化杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号