首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腰-硬联合阻滞与硬膜外阻滞用于分娩镇痛的比较
引用本文:王迪建. 腰-硬联合阻滞与硬膜外阻滞用于分娩镇痛的比较[J]. 实用预防医学, 2011, 18(7): 1288-1289
作者姓名:王迪建
作者单位:长沙玛丽亚妇产医院麻醉科,湖南长沙,410006
摘    要:
目的比较腰硬联合阻滞与硬膜外阻滞用于分娩镇痛的效果、安全性及对产程、剖宫产率的影响。方法自愿接受分娩镇痛的产妇120例,随机分为腰硬联合组(A组,n=60),硬膜外组(B组,n=60)。比较两组在用药剂量、镇痛效果、产程进展、剖宫产率等几方面有无差别。结果 A、B两组在镇痛效果、安全性方面差异无统计学意义;而A组在产程进展、镇痛起效时间、镇痛满意率上明显优于B组;A组使用的药物剂量较低,剖宫产率也明显低于B组。结论与硬膜外阻滞相比,腰硬联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛效果确切,用药剂量较少,缩短产程且剖宫产率较低。

关 键 词:分娩镇痛  腰硬联合阻滞  硬膜外阻滞

Comparison of Combined Spinal-epidural Block with Epidural Block for Anodyne Labor
WANG Di-jian. Comparison of Combined Spinal-epidural Block with Epidural Block for Anodyne Labor[J]. Practical Preventive Medicine, 2011, 18(7): 1288-1289
Authors:WANG Di-jian
Affiliation:WANG Di-jian(Department of Anesthesiology,Changsha Maria Maternity Hospital,Changsha 410006,Hunan,China)
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect,safety,process of labor and birth,and the rate of cesarean section on delivery of combined spinal-epidural block and epidural block in anodyne labor.Methods One hundred and twenty lying-in women who accepted anodyne labor willingly.They were randomly divided into combined spinal-epidural block group(group A,n=60) and epidural block group(group B,n=60).The drug dosage of anesthesia,analgesic effect,labor progress,and the rate of cesarean section were compared between the two g...
Keywords:Anodyne labor  Combined spinal-epidural block  Epidural block  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号