Underweight patients with anorexia nervosa: comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis using five equations to dual X-ray absorptiometry |
| |
Authors: | Mattar Lama Godart Nathalie Melchior Jean Claude Falissard Bruno Kolta Sami Ringuenet Damien Vindreau Christine Nordon Clementine Blanchet Corinne Pichard Claude |
| |
Affiliation: | aINSERM U669, PSIGIAM ‘Paris Sud Innovation Group in Adolescent Mental Health’, Maison des Adolescents, 97 Boulevard De Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France;bService de psychiatrie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris 42, Boulevard Jourdan 75014 Paris, France;cUniversité Paris Descartes, Université Paris Sud et Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France;dUnité de Nutrition clinique-Maladies infectieuses, Département de Médecine aiguë, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France;eUniversité Versailles St Quentin en Yvelines, France;fCochin Hospital, Rheumatology Department, Paris, France;gAP-HP, Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Eating disorders unit, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France;hAP-HP, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Clinique des maladies mentales et de l’Encéphale, Paris, France;iAP-HP, Maison des Adolescents de Cochin-Maison Paris, France;jUnité de Nutrition, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 4, 97 Boulevard De Port Royal, 1211 Genève 14, Suisse, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | Background & aimsBody weight changes do not reflect the respective changes of body compartments, namely fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM). Both bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and the Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measure FFM and FM.This study in underweight patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) aims to compare measurements of FM and FFM done by DXA and BIA using 5 different BIA equations already validated in healthy population and to identify the most suitable BIA equation for AN patients.MethodsFifty female patients with AN (BMI = 14.3 ± 1.49, age = 19.98 ± 5.68 yrs) were included in the study. Body composition was measured by DXA (Delphi W, Hologic, Bedford, MA) and by 50 kHz BIA (FORANA, Helios) using 5 different BIA equations validated in healthy population (Sun, Geneva, Kushner, Deurenberg and Roubenoff equations). Comparison between the DXA and the 5 BIA equations was done using the sum of the squares of differences and Bland–Altman plots.ResultsThe Deurenberg equation gave the best estimates of FFM when compared to the measurements by DXA (FFMdxa = 35.80 kg versus FFMdeurenberg = 36.36 kg) and very close estimates of FM (FMdxa = 9.16 kg and FMdeurenberg = 9.57 kg) The Kushner equation showed slightly better estimates for FM (FMkushner = 9.0 kg) when compared to the DXA, but not for FFM. Sun equation gave the broadest differences for FM and FFM when compared with DXA.ConclusionThe best available BIA equation to calculate the FFM and the FM in patients with AN is the Deurenberg equation. It takes into account the weight, height and age and is applicable in adults and adolescents AN patients with BMI of 12.8–21.0, and for ages between 13.4 and up to 36.9 years. |
| |
Keywords: | Anorexia nervosa Body composition Bioelectrical impedance analysis Dual X-ray absorptiometry Body mass index |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|