Quality of life among implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients in the primary prevention therapeutic era

BACKGROUND: Although patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death are the fastest growing segment of the ICD recipient population, the quality-of-life (QOL) effects of the ICD among primary prevention patients are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the health-related QOL among primary and secondary prevention ICD recipients, and to determine predictive factors for high or low QOL in each group. METHODS: Forty-five primary prevention and 75 secondary prevention ICD recipients receiving routine care in electrophysiology clinics within the University of Pennsylvania Health System were assessed using several well-validated general and ICD-specific QOL instruments. RESULTS: Between primary and secondary prevention patients, there were no significant differences in EuroQol 5D (medians: 0.84 vs 0.84, P = 0.71), Health Utilities Index (medians: 0.88 vs 0.85, P = 0.95), Short Form-12 aggregate physical summary (means: 45 vs 46, P = 0.64), and Short Form-12 aggregate mental summary (means: 46 vs 47, P = 0.93) scores. Both primary and secondary prevention patients viewed their devices favorably according to the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey scale, with no significant differences between group means (80 vs 83, P = 0.71). However, substantial fractions of both primary and secondary prevention recipients had particular concerns about lifting (40%), sexual activity (19%), and driving (14%). CONCLUSIONS: QOL does not significantly differ between primary prevention and secondary prevention ICD recipients. Device recipients had comparable QOL to published, nationwide QOL estimates among non-ICD patients of similar age. The ICD was highly acceptable to most primary and secondary prevention patients.