首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

破裂腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗与手术治疗效果比较
引用本文:韩万里,戴向晨,罗宇东,范海伦,冯 舟,朱杰昌,张益伟. 破裂腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗与手术治疗效果比较[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2015, 0(4): 304-307
作者姓名:韩万里  戴向晨  罗宇东  范海伦  冯 舟  朱杰昌  张益伟
作者单位:(天津医科大学总医院普通外科,天津 300052)
摘    要:目的:比较破裂腹主动脉瘤(rAAA)腔内治疗(EVAR)与开放手术(OSR)的治疗情况。方法:回顾性分析分别采取开放手术或腔内治疗的rAAA患者临床资料。比较两组术前一般情况、围手术期死亡率及并发症发生率、术后死亡率、术后住院时间等。结果:rAAA患者共35例,其中男28例,女7例,年龄37~84岁,平均(68.37±10.04)岁。 OSR 23例、 EVAR 12例。 两组在年龄、性别、合并症及术前血流动力学稳定性方面无显著性差异(P>0.05)。OSR组与EVAR组的死亡率依次为:手术期17.4%(4/23)、0(0/12)(P=0.275),术后30 d死亡率30.4%(7/23)、0(0/12)(P=0.070),术后6个月34.8%(8/23)、0.0%(0/12)(P=0.032),术后12个月45.0%(9/20)、0(0/8)(P=0.029);两组术后住院天数中位数分别是:OSR 17.0 (IQR:14.0~27.0),EVAR 11.0 (IQR:7.0~16.0) (P=0.024)。结论:腔内治疗可作为rAAA的一线治疗手段,但应根据解剖条件进行手术方式的选择 。单臂支架型血管(AUI)是控制rAAA出血的快速、有效方式。EVAR术后必需加强对腹腔间隔室综合征的观察与处理。

关 键 词:破裂腹主动脉瘤  开放手术  腔内治疗  腹室综合征

Comparing the effects of endovascular and open surgery repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
HAN Wan-li,DAI Xiang-chen,LUO Yu-dong,FAN Hai-lun,FENG Zhou,ZHU Jie-chang,ZHANG Yi-wei. Comparing the effects of endovascular and open surgery repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. Journal of Tianjin Medical University, 2015, 0(4): 304-307
Authors:HAN Wan-li  DAI Xiang-chen  LUO Yu-dong  FAN Hai-lun  FENG Zhou  ZHU Jie-chang  ZHANG Yi-wei
Affiliation:(Department of General Surgery, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University ,Tianjin 300052, China)
Abstract:Objective: To compare and analyze effects of endovascular repair (EVAR) and open surgery repair (OSR) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm(rAAA). Methods: Clinical data of patients with rAAA were analyzed retrospectively. Outcome parameters included mortality (intraoperation, 30 day, 6 month and 12 month), complications, reinterventions, and length of hospital stay. Results: Thirty-five consecutive patients with rAAAs were presented, 12 of whom underwent rEVAR, and 23 underwent OSR. Twenty-eight males and 7 females, age from 37 to 84 years with an mean of (68.37 ± 10.04). At baseline, an equal distribution in age , gender , comorbidities and preoperative hemodynamic (P> 0.05). The intraoperation, 30 day, 6 month and 12 month mortalities were 0.0%(0 of 12), 0.0%(0 of 12), 0.0%(0 of 12),and 0.0%(0 of 8) after rEVAR, compared with 17.4% (4 of 23; P =0.275), 30.4% (7 of 23; P =0.070), 34.8% (8 of 23; P =0.032), and 45.0% (9 of 20; P =0.029) after OSR, respectively. Median length of hospital stay was 11.0 days (interquartile range, 7.0~16.0) after rEVAR and 17.0 days (interquartile range, 14.0~27.0) after OSR (P =0.024). Conclusion: These data suggest that EVAR can be a first-line treatment for rAAA. However, anatomical conditions should be considered with caution. Aortouniiliac is a fast and effective way to control bleeding. Further observation of abdominal compartment syndrome is essential for EVAR.
Keywords:ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm  open surgery repair  endovascular repair  abdominal compartment syndrome
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《天津医科大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《天津医科大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号