首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Degarelix as an Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy for One or More Treatment Cycles in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Authors:Laurent Boccon-Gibod  Peter Albers  Juan Morote  Hendrik van Poppel  Jean de la Rosette  Arnauld Villers  Anders Malmberg  Anders Neijber  Francesco Montorsi
Affiliation:1. Membre de l’Académie de Chirurgie, Expert près les Tribunaux, Paris, France;2. Department of Urology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany;3. Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;4. Department of Urology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;5. Department of Urology G4-172, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;6. Department of Urology, CHU Lille, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France;g Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Clin R&D, Global Biometrics, Copenhagen, Denmark;h Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Clin R&D, Urology, Copenhagen, Denmark;i Cattedra di Urologia, Università Vita e Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
Abstract:

Background

Guidelines for prostate cancer treatment suggest that intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) can be considered for certain patients.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of degarelix as IAD for one or more treatment cycle(s) in prostate cancer patients requiring androgen deprivation.

Design, setting, and participants

This open-label uncontrolled multicenter study included patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >4 to 50 ng/ml or PSA doubling time <24 mo. Induction included 7-mo treatment. Off-treatment period started when PSA was ≤4 ng/ml and lasted up to 24 mo based on PSA and testosterone levels. Treatment was reinitiated when PSA was >4 ng/ml.

Intervention

Each induction period included a starting dose of degarelix 240 mg, and thereafter 80 mg once a month for 6 mo, followed by off-treatment periods.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary end point was time to PSA >4 ng/ml. Secondary end points were subgroup analysis of the primary end point, time to testosterone >0.5 and >2.2 ng/ml, quality of life (QoL), and sexual function during the first off-treatment period.

Results and limitations

Of 213 patients in the first induction period, 191 entered the first off-treatment period, 35 patients entered the second induction, and 30 entered the second off-treatment period. Only two patients entered the third cycle. Median time to PSA >4 ng/ml and duration of first off-treatment period was 392 d each. Significant differences in time to PSA >4 ng/ml were observed between subgroups stratified by prognostic factors (previous curative treatment, cancer stage, PSA levels, and Gleason scores). Time to testosterone >0.5 and >2.2 ng/ml was 112 and 168 d, respectively. Change in QoL remained nonsignificant, and sexual function gradually improved during the off-treatment period. Adverse events were fewer during the off-treatment period and subsequent treatment cycles.

Conclusions

IAD with degarelix resulted in an improvement in sexual function commensurate with increased testosterone levels while PSA remained suppressed. The treatment for one treatment cycle or more was well tolerated.

Patient summary

Guidelines for prostate cancer treatment suggest that intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) can be considered for certain patients. IAD with degarelix resulted in improved sexual function commensurate with increased testosterone levels while prostate-specific antigen remained suppressed. The treatment for one treatment cycle or more was well tolerated.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00801242.
Keywords:Efficacy   GnRH antagonist   Intermittent androgen deprivation   Prostate cancer   safety
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号