Transvesical Robotic Simple Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Experience |
| |
Authors: | Scott Leslie Andre Luis de Castro AbreuSameer Chopra Patrick RamosDaniel Park Andre K. BergerMihir M. Desai Inderbir S. GillMonish Aron |
| |
Affiliation: | Institute of Urology, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA |
| |
Abstract: |
BackgroundDespite significant developments in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), simple prostatectomy remains an excellent option for patients with large glands.ObjectiveTo describe our technique of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP).Design, setting, and participantsFrom May 2011 to April 2013, 25 patients underwent RSP.Surgical procedureWe performed RSP using our technique.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisBaseline demographics, pathology data, perioperative complications, 90-d complications, and functional outcomes were assessed.Results and limitationsMean patient age was 72.9 yr (range: 54–88), baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 23.9 (range: 9–35), prostate volume was 149.6 ml (range: 91–260), postvoid residual (PVR) was 208.1 ml (range: 72–800), maximum flow rate (Qmax) was 11.3 ml/s, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen was 9.4 ng/ml (range: 1.9–56.3). Eight patients were catheter dependent before surgery. Mean operative time was 214 min (range: 165–345), estimated blood loss was 143 ml (range: 50–350), and the hospital stay was 4 d (range: 2–8). There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Five patients had a concomitant robotic procedure performed. Early functional outcomes demonstrated significant improvement from baseline with an 85% reduction in mean IPSS (p < 0.0001), an 82.2% reduction in mean PVR (p = 0.014), and a 77% increase in mean Qmax (p = 0.20). This study is limited by small sample size and short follow-up period. One patient had a urinary tract infection; two had recurrent hematuria, one requiring transfusion; one patient had clot retention and extravasation, requiring reoperation.ConclusionsOur technique of RSP is safe and effective. Good functional outcomes suggest it is a viable option for BPH and larger glands and can be used for patients requiring concomitant procedures.Patient summaryWe describe the technique and report the initial results of a series of cases of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy. The procedure is both feasible and safe and a good option for benign prostatic hyperplasia with larger glands. |
| |
Keywords: | Benign prostatic hyperplasia Simple prostatectomy Robotic surgery |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|