Axillary thoracotomy versus videothoracoscopy for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax |
| |
Authors: | Freixinet Jorge L Canalís Emilio Juliá Gabriel Rodriguez Pedro Santana Norberto Rodriguez de Castro Felipe |
| |
Affiliation: | a Thoracic Surgery and Respiratory Services, Hospital de Gran Canaria “Dr. Negrín,” Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain b Thoracic Surgery Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | ![]()
BackgroundA prospective, randomized study was carried out on patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax, with the aim of determining if video-assisted thoracoscopy is superior to axillary thoracotomy in the surgical treatment of this condition.MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to two groups; video-assisted thoracoscopy (group A; n = 46) and axillary thoracotomy (group B; n = 44). All fit the established criteria for surgical indication (relapse or persistent air leakage after pleural drainage). In all cases the treatment consisted of apical segmentectomy of the blebs or dystrophic complex and pleural mechanical abrasion. The study evaluated the following factors: postoperative blood loss, respiratory function (maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures, forced expiratory volume in the first second and forced vital capacity), postoperative pain (analog visual scale), supplementary doses of analgesics, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and resumption of normal activity. Relapses were evaluated for the minimum period of time of two years.ResultsNo significant differences were found in any of the factors studied in either group.ConclusionsVideo-assisted thoracoscopy and axillary thoracotomy offer similar results in the surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The rate of complication is low and the level of pain is acceptable without long-term sequelae. |
| |
Keywords: | 11 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|