首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

新型脑出血临床评估量表
引用本文:陆菁菁,赵性泉. 新型脑出血临床评估量表[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2012, 7(3): 236-241
作者姓名:陆菁菁  赵性泉
作者单位:北京首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经内科
基金项目:北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人员培养计划(2009-3-27)
摘    要:
自2001年首个脑出血(intracerebral hemorrhage,ICH)预后评估量表问世以来,其临床有效性得到了充分的外部验证。但毕竟原始脑出血(original ICH,oICH)评分量表是设计来评价30 d死亡事件的,并没有包括诸多与预后密切相关的因子,因此对功能预后的预测准确率欠佳。为了预测ICH患者的功能预后,一系列新型评测体系被建立起来。本文主要针对现有的新型ICH评估量表从研究背景、方法学、评估指标、外部验证等几个方面进行综述,以期阐明其适用范围和临床效度,为临床医师按需选择提供参考。

关 键 词:出血  评估量表  预后  评估  
收稿时间:2011-09-12

New Grading Scales of Intracerebral Hemorrhage
LU Jing-Jing , ZHAO Xing-Quan. New Grading Scales of Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2012, 7(3): 236-241
Authors:LU Jing-Jing    ZHAO Xing-Quan
Affiliation:LU Jing-Jing, ZHAO Xing-Quan. Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beij'ing 100050, China
Abstract:
Since the first grading scale was introduced by Hemphill in 2001, its efficiency has been confirmed by external validations. Because the original intracerebral hemorrhage(olCH) score was originally intended to predict 30-day mortality and does not include factors that have been strongly associated with outcome following intracerebral hemorrhage(ICH), its accuracy of predicting functional outcome is poor. A number of new ICH clinical grading scales have been developed to predict various outcome measures following ICH. We extensively reviewed the academic and social backgrounds, study methodologies, scale definitions and external validations of existing new generation grading scales in this article. Our purpose is to elucidate range of application and validating intensiW of different gxading scales of ICH.
Keywords:Intracerebral hemorrhage  Clinical grading scale  Outcome, measures
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国卒中杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国卒中杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号