首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

三分群血细胞分析仪显微镜复检标准探讨
引用本文:龙欢喜,魏小平. 三分群血细胞分析仪显微镜复检标准探讨[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2006, 6(8): 950-951
作者姓名:龙欢喜  魏小平
作者单位:广州医学院第二附属医院检验科,广州,510260;广州医学院第一附属医院检验科,广州,510182
摘    要:
目的比较三分群血细胞分析仪和显微镜下白细胞分类结果,探讨三分群血细胞分析仪中间细胞群(mononnuclear,Mo)的显微镜复检标准,以保证血液常规的检验质量。方法应用KX-21三分群血细胞分析仪和普通光学显微镜分别对302例临床血液常规标本进行白细胞分类,并进行对比分析。结果Mo<8%时,仪器分类结果与显微镜分类结果无显著性差异,且有良好的相关性。Mo>8%时,仪器分类结果与显微镜分类结果有显著性差异,其中有8.6%的标本显微镜分类出现异常情况。结论三分群血细胞分析仪仅作为白细胞分类的初筛,尚不能完全替代人工显微镜分类方法。临床应用中引入显微镜复检标准,可为临床提供有价值的诊断信息。

关 键 词:血细胞分析仪  分类  中间细胞群
文章编号:1672-3619(2006)08-0950-02
收稿时间:2006-04-20
修稿时间:2006-05-23

Compare the Blood Cell Count Determined by Blood Cell Analyzer and Microscopic Examination
LONG Huan-xi,WEI Xiao-ping. Compare the Blood Cell Count Determined by Blood Cell Analyzer and Microscopic Examination[J]. Journal Of Tropical Medicine, 2006, 6(8): 950-951
Authors:LONG Huan-xi  WEI Xiao-ping
Abstract:
Objective To compare the results of the white blood cell classification by using the automatic blood cell analyzer and microscopic examination. Method 302 blood specimens were classified by the KX21 full-automatic blood cell analyzer and microscopic examination. Result When mononucleated cells were less than 8%, there was no significant difference between the results obtained from blood cell analyzer and microscopic examination. However, there was discrepancy between the results when the mononucleated cells more than 8%. Conclusion The blood cell analyzer can only provide simple classification of leukocyte count and can not completely replace the microscope classification. It is important to confirm the blood cell count by microscpoic examination as a standard procedure to ensure the quality of clinical hematological diagnosis.
Keywords:blood cell analyzer  classification  mononucleated cell
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号