Efficacy of Intraoperative Cooling Methods

Background: Patients may require perioperative cooling for a variety of reasons including treatment of a malignant hyperthermia crisis and induction of therapeutic hypothermia for neurosurgery. The authors compared heat transfer and core cooling rates with five cooling methods.

Methods: Six healthy volunteers were anesthetized with desflurane and nitrous oxide. The cooling methods were 1) circulating water (5 [degree sign] Celsius, full-length mattress and cover), 2) forced air (10 [degree sign] Celsius, full-length cover), 3) gastric lavage (500 ml iced water every 10 min), 4) bladder lavage (300 ml iced Ringer's solution every 10 min), and 5) ice-water immersion. Each method was applied for 40 min or until the volunteers' core temperatures approached 34 [degree sign] Celsius. The volunteers were rewarmed to normothermia between treatments. Core cooling rates were evaluated using linear regression.

Results: The first volunteer developed abdominal cramping and diarrhea after gastric lavage. Consequently, the technique was not again attempted. Bladder lavage increased heat loss 10 [nearly =] 10 W and decreased core temperature 0.8 +/- 0.3 [degree sign] Celsius/h (r2 = 0.99 +/- 0.002; means +/- SD). Forced-air and circulating-water cooling comparably increased heat flux, [nearly =] 170 W. Consequently, core cooling rates were similar during the two treatments at 1.7 +/- 0.5 [degree sign] Celsius/h (r2 = 0.99 +/- 0.001) and 1.6 +/- 1.1 [degree sign] Celsius/h (r2 = 0.98 +/- 0.02), respectively. Immersion in an ice water slurry increased heat loss [nearly =] 600-800 W and decreased core temperature 9.7 +/- 4.4 [degree sign] Celsius/h (r sup 2 = 0.98 +/- 0.01). Immersion cooling was associated with an afterdrop of [nearly =] 2 [degree sign] Celsius.