Birth weight and adult cardiovascular risk factors using multiple birth status as an instrumental variable in the 1958 British Birth Cohort |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region;2. City University of New York and Hunter College, School of Public Health, New York, United States;1. National Research Institute for Family Planning, China;2. Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, China;3. Environmental and Spatial Epidemiology Research Center, National Human Genetic Resources Center, China;4. Department of Maternal and Child Health, National Health and Family Planning Commission of the PRC, China;1. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina School at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;2. Department of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundBirth weight is classified as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease by the World Health Organization, but appropriate preventive interventions remain unclear because the observations have not been confirmed in experiments and appear to be contextually specific.MethodsUsing 9452 participants of the 1958 British Birth Cohort at age 42 years in 2000 (58% follow-up), we examined the credibility of multiple birth status as an instrumental variable (IV) for birth weight and, if appropriate, use it to obtain less confounded estimates of the associations of birth weight with cardiovascular disease risk factors including self-reported height, body mass index and hypertension than conventional regression in 2014.ResultsMultiple birth (203 twins and 6 triplets) was associated with older maternal age, but not with paternal occupation or maternal smoking. Multiple births had lower birth weight-for-gestational age z-score. Multiple birth status was not directly associated with height, BMI or hypertension. Using IV estimates birth weight-for-gestational age z-score was not clearly associated with height (0.99 cm, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.27, 2.25), body mass index (BMI) (0.42 kg/m2, 95% CI − 0.17, 1.01) or hypertension (risk ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.54, 1.23) adjusted for maternal age, with a first-stage F statistic of 145.3 from IV analysis.ConclusionsMultiple birth status is a credible IV for obtaining a less confounded estimate of the association of birth weight with height, BMI and blood pressure. Such analysis suggests that birth weight may be spuriously related to height, BMI and blood pressure, and thus not an effective target for intervention. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|