首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

肠结核与克罗恩病的鉴别诊断研究
引用本文:何卫,陈瑞海. 肠结核与克罗恩病的鉴别诊断研究[J]. 中国医药导报, 2013, 10(18): 44-46
作者姓名:何卫  陈瑞海
作者单位:浙江省温州市中西医结合医院检验科,浙江温州,325000
基金项目:浙江省中医药科技计划项目
摘    要:
目的对比分析肠结核(ITB)与克罗恩病(CD)的临床、内镜及病理特征,探讨结核杆菌特异性T细胞检测(QFT-GIT)在ITB与CD鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法选择2010年12月~2012年2月在浙江省温州市中西医结合医院就诊,明确诊断为ITB(ITB组,n=30)或CD(CD组,n=20)的患者50例。分别行结核菌素皮试(TST)及QFT-GIT检测,同时观察患者临床表现、内镜表现、病理学特征。结果①两组在充血水肿、糜烂、节段性改变、肠腔狭窄、息肉增生比例等方面,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);但ITB组裂隙状溃疡、鹅卵石样变比例[0.0%(0/30)、0.0%(0/30)]低于CD组[30.0%(6/20)、15.0%(3/20)],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。②两组肠全壁炎症、淋巴细胞聚集、非干酪性肉芽肿所占比例差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);但ITB组裂隙状溃疡[0.0%(0/30)]、隐窝脓肿[0.0%(0/30)]比例低于CD组[25.0%(5/20)、15.0%(3/20)],ITB组干酪性肉芽肿比例[23.3%(7/30)]高于CD组[0.0%(0/20)],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。③QFT-GIT敏感性优于TST(83.3%比46.7%),特异性优于TST(95.0%比75.0%),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 ITB与CD的内镜及病理表现相似,差异较少且不常见,易出现误诊。QFT-GIT敏感性好特异性高,有助于提高肠结核检出率,可作为临床鉴别ITB与CD的重要辅助诊断方法,具有一定的临床推广价值。

关 键 词:肠结核  克罗恩病  内镜  病理特征  结核杆菌特异性T细胞检测

Research on differential diagnosis between Crohn disease and intestinal tuberculosis
HE Wei , CHEN Ruihai. Research on differential diagnosis between Crohn disease and intestinal tuberculosis[J]. China Medical Herald, 2013, 10(18): 44-46
Authors:HE Wei    CHEN Ruihai
Affiliation:( Department of Clinical Laboratory, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325000, China)
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical,endoscopic and histological pathologic features and to evaluate the value of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube(QFT-GIT) assay in differential diagnosis between intestinal tuberculosis(ITB) and Crohn disease(CD).Methods 50 patients diagnosed with ITB(ITB group,n=30) or CD(CD group,n=20) in Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wenzhou City from December 2010 to February 2012 were selected.The patients were treated with TST and QFT-GIT detection,the clinical,endoscopic and histolog ical pathologic features were analyzed.Results ①The differences of proportion on hyperemia edema,erosion,segmental changes,lumen stenosis,hyperplasia polyp between ITB group and CD group were not statistically significant(P 0.05);the proportion of fissuring ulcers,cobblestone appearance in ITB group [0.0%(0/30),0.0%(0/30)] were lower than those in CD group [30.0%(6/20),15.0%(3/20)],the differences were statistically significant(P 0.05).② The differences of proportion on bowel wall inflammation,lymphoid aggregates,non-caseous granulomatous between ITB group and CD group were not statistically significant(P 0.05);the proportion of fissuring ulcers,crypt abscess in ITB group [0.0%(0/30),0.0%(0/30)] were lower than those in CD group [25.0%(5/20),15.0%(3/20)],the proportion of caseous granulomatous in ITB group [23.3%(7/30)] was higher than that in CD group [0.0%(0/20)],the differences were statistically significant(P 0.05).③Susceptibility of QFT-GIT were better than that of TST(83.3% vs 46.7%),specificity of QFT-GIT were better than that of TST(95.0% vs 75.0%),the differences were statistically significant(P 0.05).Conclusion Endoscopic and pathological manifestations of ITB and CD are similar,differences are less and uncommon.QFT-GIT has better susceptibility and specificity,it is helpful to enhance the detection rate of ITB,it is an important auxiliary diagnostic method for the differential diagnosis of ITB and CD;it is worthy of clinical promo tion.
Keywords:Intestinal tuberculosis  Crohn disease  Endoscopic  Histological pathologic features  QFT-GIT
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号