| 气压弹道碎石与体外冲击波碎石的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢磊,虞晓勇,李文杰,叶琪辉,谢超凡,夏宏辉.气压弹道碎石与体外冲击波碎石的比较[J].中国基层医药,2006,13(6):910-911. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢磊 虞晓勇 李文杰 叶琪辉 谢超凡 夏宏辉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 518052,广东省深圳,深圳市南山人民医院泌尿外科
2. 中山大学中山医学院03届 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 评价输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术（PL）与体外冲击波碎石术（ESWL）治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效。方法 对经PL（PL组）和ESWL（ESWL组）治疗的输尿管下段结石患者的临床资料进行比较。结果 术后4周结石排净率PL组为97．19％，ESWL组为73．16％。两组比较，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论 输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效明显优于ESWL。
|
| 关 键 词： | 输尿管结石 输尿管镜 碎石术 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-02-22 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年2月22日 |
Comparison of ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi |
| |
| XIE Lei,YU Xiao-yong,LI Wen-jie,YE Qi-Hui,XIE Chao-fan,XIA Hong-hui.Comparison of ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi[J].Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy,2006,13(6):910-911. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE Lei YU Xiao-yong LI Wen-jie YE Qi-Hui XIE Chao-fan XIA Hong-hui |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect and safety of ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy(PL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi.Methods 368 cases of distal ureteral calculi were divided into the PL treatment group(178 cases) and the ESWL treatment groups(190 cases).The clinical datas were compared between the two groups.Results PL treatment group 97.19% patients became stone free in 4 weeks,and in ESWL treatment group the stone free rate was 73.16%(P<0.05).Conclusion For the treatment of distal ureteral calculi,ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy has a higher stone free rate than ESWL. |
| |
| Keywords: | Ureteral calculi Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
