首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Laninamivir octanoate for post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza in household contacts: a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial
Authors:Seizaburo Kashiwagi  Akira Watanabe  Hideyuki Ikematsu  Shinichiro Awamura  Takako Okamoto  Mitsutoshi Uemori  Katsuyasu Ishida
Affiliation:1. Kashiwagi Clinic, SS Building Hakata-Ekimae 4F, 3-21-15 Hakataekimae, Hakata-ku, Fukuoka, 812-0011, Japan
2. Research Division for Development of Anti-Infective Agents, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Seiryomachi 4-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
3. Department of Clinical Trials, Center for Advanced Medical Innovation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
4. Clinical Development Department II, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Hiromachi 1-2-58, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 140-8710, Japan
5. Clinical Data and Biostatistics Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 140-8710, Japan
Abstract:Laninamivir octanoate, a long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor, is an effective treatment for influenza. However, its effectiveness for the prevention of influenza has not yet been demonstrated. We conducted a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether laninamivir octanoate was superior to a placebo for post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza in household contacts. Eligible participants, who were household members who did not have influenza and were in contact with an influenza-infected index patient, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three groups: 20 mg of laninamivir octanoate once daily for 2 days (LO-2), 20 mg of laninamivir octanoate once daily for 3 days (LO-3), or a placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who developed clinical influenza during a 10-day period. A total of 1711 participants were enrolled, and 1451 participants were included in the primary analysis. The proportion of participants with clinical influenza was 3.9 % (19/487) in the LO-2 group, 3.7 % (18/486) in the LO-3 group, and 16.9 % (81/478) in the placebo group (P < 0.001 for each of the laninamivir octanoate group). The relative risk reductions, compared with the placebo group, were 77.0 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 62.7–85.8] and 78.1 % (95 % CI 64.1–86.7 %) for the LO-2 and LO-3 groups, respectively. The incidences of adverse events in the laninamivir octanoate groups were similar to that in the placebo group. The inhalation of 20 mg of laninamivir octanoate once daily for 2 or 3 days was well tolerated and effectively prevented the development of influenza in household contacts.
Keywords:Laninamivir  Neuraminidase inhibitor  Influenza  Prophylaxis  Post-exposure  Household contact
本文献已被 ScienceDirect SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号