经尿道前列腺汽化电切术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生症的效果对比

目的 对比分析经尿道前列腺汽化电切术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生症的效果.方法 将本院2011年3月～2013年2月收治的90例前列腺增生症患者随机分为观察组（n=45）和对照组（n=45）,观察组患者采用经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗,对照组患者采用尿道前列腺电切术治疗,比较两组患者的疗效.结果 观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后冲洗时间、术后留置导尿管时间、住院时间少于对照组（P＜0.05）,残余尿量、国际前列腺症状评分和生活质量评分优于对照组（P＜0.05）,但是两组患者的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.结论 经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗前列腺增生症具有疗效更确切、出血少、恢复快等优势,可以作为治疗前列腺增生症的首选方法.

Comparation of curative effect of transurethral vapo-resection of prostate and transurethral resection of prostate for treatment of hyperplasia of prostate

Objective To compare and analyze the curative effect of transurethral vapo-resection of prostate and transurethral resection of prostate for treatment of hyperplasia of prostate.Methods 90 patients with hyperplasia of prostate in our hospital from March 2011 to February 2013 were randomly divided into observation group （n=45） and control group （n=45）.Observation group was given the transurethral vapo-resection of prostate therapy,and control group was given the transurethral resection of prostate.The effect of two groups was compared.Results The operation time,per- i-operative bleeding,flushing time,indwelling catheter time,was shorter than those of the control group （P〈0.05）;residual urine volume,international prostate symptom score and quality of life in observation group were significantly better than those in control group （P〈0.05）.There was no significant difference about the complacation between two groups （P〉0.05）. Conclusions Transurethral vapo-resection of prostate for treatment of hyperplasia of prostate has many advantages,in- cluding better effect,less bleeding and quick recovery.h can be as preferred method to treat hyperplasia of prostate.