Pharmacy provision of emergency contraception to men: A survey of pharmacist attitudes in Rhode Island |
| |
Authors: | Brian T. Nguyen Nickolas Zaller |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 5SU, United Kingdom;2. Chalmers Sexual Health Centre, 2A Chalmers Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9ES, United Kingdom;3. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom;4. Department of Public Health and Health Policy, NHS Lothian, Waverley Gate, 2-4 Waterloo Place, Edinburgh, EH1 3EG;5. Pharmacy Department, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Terrace, Edinburgh, EH10 5HF;1. University of California San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Oakland, CA 94612, USA;2. Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA 94612, USA;3. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA;1. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine;2. University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology;3. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveTo describe pharmacy staff members's attitudes and practices related to male emergency contraception (EC) requests, as well as the occurrence of male purchases in Rhode Island.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingPharmacies throughout Rhode Island during April to August 2008.Participants226 pharmacists and pharmacy technicians.InterventionParticipants were mailed a 21-item closed-ended questionnaire.Main outcome measuresDemographics, EC provision practices, recall of male EC purchases, and attitudes toward male EC access.ResultsOf 151 pharmacies surveyed, 91 responded, providing 226 individual pharmacy staff member surveys. Among this population, 95.6% sold EC. Although 59.7% believed male EC purchases occurred rarely, 63.3% sold EC to a man in the previous year. Ten (4.4%) respondents refused sale of EC to a man. Respondents were less likely to agree that men should always have access if they also believed that access would decrease regular contraceptive use (P = 0.008) and if they could not verify the female recipient'ss consent (P < 0.001).ConclusionPharmacists and technicians commonly believed that male EC purchases did not occur or occurred rarely; however, more than one-half of this population sold EC to men. Although the majority expressed personal reservations against providing EC to men, they still agreed that men should have access to EC. These findings suggest that pharmacies are an acceptable setting for male EC access and that although refusal exists, it may not be a barrier to access. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|