Evaluation of medication reconciliation in an ambulatory setting before and after pharmacist intervention |
| |
Authors: | Lauren Peyton Kristie Ramser Gale Hamann Dipika Patel David Kuhl Laura Sprabery Bruce Steinhauer |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA;2. University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of Pharmacy, Sonderegger Research Center, Madison, WI, USA;3. University of Wisconsin–Madison, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Madison, WI, USA;4. University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of Nursing, USA;1. School of Pharmacy, Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan;2. Pharmacy Department, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK;3. School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, UK |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() ObjectivesTo determine the accuracy of medication reconciliation in an internal medicine clinic and to evaluate pharmacist interventions targeted at improving the accuracy of medication reconciliation.DesignProspective case series.SettingMemphis, TN, from October 2007 to March 2008.Patients180 adults attending an internal medicine appointment.InterventionOn patient arrival, a nurse completed the medication reconciliation form. In Phase 1 of the study, a pharmacist randomly selected and reviewed a patient's medication reconciliation form, interviewed the patient, and verified information if indicated. A total of 90 forms were reviewed and compared to determine baseline medication reconciliation accuracy. Education interventions were held with the medical and nursing staff, targeting areas for improvement. In Phase 2 of the study, 90 additional medication reconciliation forms were reviewed in the same manner. Phase 1 and Phase 2 results were compared to evaluate differences in accuracy after the pharmacist's education interventions.Main outcome measuresAccuracy of medication reconciliation forms and number of potentially significant errors at baseline and after pharmacist interventions.ResultsIn Phase 1, 14.4% of medication reconciliation forms were correct. The remaining forms contained 190 potentially significant errors. After the education interventions, 18.9% of medication reconciliation forms were correct and the others contained 139 potentially significant errors.ConclusionMedication reconciliation accuracy is poor. Although education interventions showed a trend toward improvement, continued education training for staff and patients is needed in addition to other interventions to optimize this process and prevent medication errors. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|