首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

相邻两节段脊髓型颈椎病两种颈前路手术方式的比较
引用本文:管旭日,沈金虎,陈继平,惠正广.相邻两节段脊髓型颈椎病两种颈前路手术方式的比较[J].徐州医学院学报,2013(12):830-832.
作者姓名:管旭日  沈金虎  陈继平  惠正广
作者单位:徐州市中医院骨科,江苏徐州221003
摘    要:目的 对比分析前路颈椎体次全切除钛网植骨融合术(ACCF)和前路颈椎间盘切除融合器融合术(ACDF)两种手术方式治疗相邻两节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效.方法 对行相邻两节段脊髓型颈椎病手术治疗的63例患者的临床资料和影像学资料进行回顾性分析,其中ACCF组34例,ACDF组29例.比较2组的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、脊髓神经功能JOA评分、颈椎生理曲度、椎体高度、融合节段稳定性及融合率.结果 与ACCF组比较,ACDF组手术时间明显缩短、术中出血量明显减少(P<0.05或P<0.01),颈椎生理曲度及椎体高度均明显改善(P<0.05或P<0.01).2组间住院时间、JOA评分、融合节段稳定性及末次随访融合率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 ACCF加钛网、ACDF加融合器均是治疗相邻两节段脊髓型颈椎病的有效术式,ACDF加融合器术在缩短手术时间、减少术中出血量、维持颈椎生理曲度及椎体高度方面有明显优势.

关 键 词:脊髓型颈椎病  颈前路手术  融合器  钛网

Comparison of the outcomes of two operating procedures for two-adjacent-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy
GUAN Xuri,SHEN Jinhu,CHEN Jiping,HUI Zhengguang.Comparison of the outcomes of two operating procedures for two-adjacent-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou,2013(12):830-832.
Authors:GUAN Xuri  SHEN Jinhu  CHEN Jiping  HUI Zhengguang
Institution:(Xuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221003, China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the outcomes of patients treated with either anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) or anterior cervical diseectomy with fusion (ACDF) for two - adjacent - level cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods The case histories of 63 patents underwent surgical treatment for two - adjacent - level cervical spondylotic myelopathy were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were either treated with ACCF ( ACCF group, n = 34) or ACDF ( ACDF group, n = 29). The operation time, intra - operative bleeding amount, JOA score of spinal function, stability of the vertebral segment, vertebral height, and fusion rate between the 2 groups were compared. Results Compared with ACCF group, the operation time was significantly shorter and the intra - operative bleeding amount was significantly smaller in ACDF group ( P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01 ) , cervical lordosis and vertebral height were significantly improved in ACDF group ( P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0. 01 ). Whereas the hospitalization time, JOA score of spinal function, the stability of the vertebral segment, and the last follow - up fusion rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups ( P 〉 O. 05 ). Conclusion Our data suggest that the two procedures yield comparable results in terms of clinical outcomes for two - adjacent - level cervical spondylotic myelopathy. However, ACDF is considered to be superior to ACCF in shortening operation time, reducing intra - operative bleeding amount, and maintaining cervical lordosis and vertebral height.
Keywords:cervical spondylotic myelopathy  anterior cervical spine operation  fusion device  titanium mesh
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号