野外驻训官兵与留守官兵心理健康状况比较

目的比较某部野外驻训官兵与留守官兵的心理健康状况。方法采用症状自评量表（Symptom Check-list 90,SCL-90）和美国加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表（University of California at Los Angeles Loneliness Scale,UCLA LS）,对某部244名野外驻训官兵及231名留守官兵进行心理健康测评。结果野外驻训官兵和留守官兵分别有57人（23.36%）和38人（16.45%）被评为异常;野外驻训官兵在SCL-90总分、抑郁、焦虑、躯体化、人际关系、偏执、强迫、敌对、UCLA LS总分上的分值均高于留守官兵（P〈0.05或0.01）及中国军人常模（P〈0.05或0.01）;留守官兵除抑郁因子分值较高外（P〈0.01）,其余因子得分与中国军人常模比较皆无明显差异;野外驻训士兵的焦虑、抑郁、敌对、偏执分值,士官的躯体化、强迫、人际关系分值,军官的人际关系及焦虑分值高于同等军衔的留守官兵（P〈0.05或0.01）,其余因子分值比较无明显差异;野外驻训的士兵、士官及军官UCLA LS分值皆高于同等军衔的留守官兵（P〈0.05或0.01）。结论野外驻训官兵的心理健康水平总体低于留守官兵;且不同军衔的心理健康异常趋向亦有所不同,在心理辅导工作中要区别对待。

Comparative Study of Mental Health Status between Servicemen in Field Training and Home Training

Objective To compare the mental health condition between the servicemen in field training and home training.Methods The mental health evaluation of 475 servicemen in field training and home training were performed using Symptom Checklist 90（SCL-90） and University of California at Los Angeles Loneliness Scale（UCLA LS）.ResultsFifty-seven（23.36%） servicemen in field training and 38（16.45%） in home training had abnormal scores.The SCL-90 total score and some factors＇ scores（depression,anxiety,somatization,interpersonal-sensitivity,paranoid ideation,obsessive-compulsive and hostility） and UCLA LS total score of the servicemen in field training were significantly higher than those of the servicemen in home training（P0.05 or 0.01） and the norm of Chinese servicemen（P0.05 or 0.01）.The soldiers in home training had higher score in depression（P0.01） and not significantly different scores in other factors than the norm of Chinese servicemen.The scores of anxiety,depression,hostility,paranoid ideation of the soldiers in filed training,th scores of somatization,compulsion,interpersonal sensitivity of the sergeants in field training and the scores of interpersonal-sensitivity and anxiety of the officers in field training were significantly higher than the corresponding servicemen with the same rank in home training（P0.05 or 0.01）.The UCLA LS scores of the soldiers,sergeants and officers in field training were higher than those of the corresponding servicemen with the same rank in home training（P0.05 or 0.01）.Conclusion The psychological status of the servicemen in filed training was worse than that of the servicemen in home training.Different ranks of servicemen had different trends of mental health abnormality and should be differentiated in psychological education.