2种雾化吸入法的效果比较

目的 观察经无创通气管路氧气驱动雾化吸入器雾化吸入的效果.方法 将使用无创呼吸机辅助通气的60例患者采取随机的方法将患者分为2组各30例,在综合治疗的基础上,观察组经无创通气管路氧气驱动雾化吸入器行雾化吸入治疗;对照组氧气驱动雾化吸入器雾化吸入时暂停无创呼吸机治疗,对2组患者雾化吸入的效果进行比较.结果 治疗结束时观察组血氧饱和度较治疗前无显著变化,但对照组显著低于治疗前,2组治疗结束时心率均显著升高,但观察组升高幅度显著低于对照组.观察组患者无明显不适,喘息较治疗前好转,雾化结束后痰液易咳出.结论 经无创通气管路氧气驱动雾化吸入器雾化吸入的效果好,值得临床推广使用.

Efficiency comparison of two nebulization inhalation therapy methods

Objective To observe the efficiency of two nebulization inhalation therapy methods in patients with non-invasive ventilation. Methods 60 patients with non-invasive ventilation were divided in-to two groups (30 cases in each group). Based on combination therapy, the observation group received oxy- gen drived nebulizer inhalation therapy through tube system of non - invasive ventilator, the control group re- ceived inhalation therapy by oxygen drived nebulizer directly with halt of non- invasive ventilation. The effi- ciency of two methods was compared between the two groups. Results At the end of treatment SaO2 in the observation group remained nearly unchanged, while that of the control group significantly de-creased,beart rate increased in both groups,bot the amplitude was lower in the observation group. Patients in the observation group showed no evident discomfort, alleviated gasp and eosy expectoration. Conclu-sions Inhalation therapy through tube system of non- invasive ventilator was more efficient and it is worthy of wide clinical application.