Alternatives to carbapenems in ESBL-producing Escherichia coli infections |
| |
Authors: | D. Fournier,C. Chirouze,J. Leroy,P. Cholley,D. Talon,P. Plé siat,X. Bertrand |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Service de bactériologie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, 25030 Besançon, France;2. Service de maladies infectieuses, centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, 25030 Besançon, France;3. Service d’hygiène hospitalière, CHU de Besançon, 3, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France;4. UMR 6249 chrono-environnement, université de Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon cedex, France |
| |
Abstract: | ![]()
ObjectivesThe authors had for objective to assess the activity of a wide panel of antibiotics on extended-spectrum-β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates (ESBL-Ec), because of the sharp increase of their frequency, leading to an increased use of carbapenems.Material and methodsWe selected 100 ESBL-Ec in which ESBLs were identified by PCR and sequencing, between 2009 and 2010. We determined the MICs of amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, temocillin, mecillinam, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, tigecycline, nitrofurantoin, and fosfomycin using reference methods. The susceptibility profiles were defined according to EUCAST 2012 recommendations.ResultsFosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, and pivmecillinam were active against more than 90% of isolates and remain excellent choices for the oral treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Temocillin and piperacillin-tazobactam are also good candidates for the treatment of pyelonephritis or bloodstream infections. Only 27, 23, and 8% of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime, cefepime, and cefotaxime, respectively.ConclusionOur study results prove that in many cases, there are non-carbapenem alternatives for the treatment of ESBL-Ec infections. |
| |
Keywords: | Escherichia coli ESBL Antibiotic resistance |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|