首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

超声骨刀与凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌阻生智齿的比较
引用本文:Gao Y,Jiang A,Li B,Yang L. 超声骨刀与凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌阻生智齿的比较[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2011, 29(4): 372-374. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1182.2011.04.010
作者姓名:Gao Y  Jiang A  Li B  Yang L
作者单位:深圳市第九人民医院口腔科, 深圳518116
摘    要:目的 探讨超声骨刀拔除下颌阻生智齿的效果.方法 根据下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度判断方案选择拔牙难度判断为较难的228颗下颌阻生智齿,分成实验组和对照组,每组114颗,实验组应用超声骨刀法拔牙,对照组采用凿骨劈冠法拔牙.对2组的拔牙时间、术后疼痛、张口受限、面部肿胀情况进行分析比较.结果 实验组平均拔牙时间为(16+5.2...

关 键 词:超声骨刀法  凿骨劈冠法  下颌阻生智齿  牙拔除术
收稿时间:2011-08-25
修稿时间:2011-08-25

Comparison of piezosurgery and chisel osteotomy in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars
Gao Yongbo,Jiang Ai,Li Boyou,Yang Liming. Comparison of piezosurgery and chisel osteotomy in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars[J]. West China journal of stomatology, 2011, 29(4): 372-374. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1182.2011.04.010
Authors:Gao Yongbo  Jiang Ai  Li Boyou  Yang Liming
Affiliation:Dept. of Stomatology, The Ninth People’s Hospital of Shenzhen City, Shenzhen 518116, China
Abstract:Objective To study the effect of piezosurgery in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars.Methods 228 mandibular impacted third molars with relative difficulty for extraction according to the scheme of de-gree of difficulty for extraction were included in the study,and were divided into two groups(114 teeth each group): Test group(treated by piezosurgery),control group(treated by traditional chisel osteotomy).The surgery time and pain,restriction of mouth opening and facial swelling after surgery,...
Keywords:piezosurgery  chisel osteotomy  mandibular impacted third molars  tooth extraction  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《华西口腔医学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《华西口腔医学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号