Non-prescribed drug use during methadone treatment by clinic- and community-based patients |
| |
Authors: | KIM WOLFF ALASTAIR W. M. HAY REW VAIL KEVIN HARRISON DUNCAN RAISTRICK |
| |
Affiliation: | Division of Pathology and Institute of Epidemiology, Research School of Medicine, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK;Department of Chemical Pathology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK;Department of Chemical Pathology, Leeds Addiction Unit, Leeds, UK |
| |
Abstract: | We investigated the efficacy of methadone maintenance treatment in clinic-based (n= 10) and community-based (n= 10) patients by studying the relationships between dose, plasma concentrations of methadone and non-prescribed drug-use using logistic regression. We found that clinic-based patients had significantly reduced odds of having a urine sample test positive for illicit drugs when compared to community-based patients (OR = 0.20; 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.38: p < 0.001). There was no relationship between either methadone dose or plasma methadone concentration and testing positive for non-prescribed drugs (including cocaine, cannabis, amphetamine, ecstasy, benzodiazepines). We looked specifically at the misuse of opiate drugs. Location was again important and clinic-based patients had significantly reduced odds of having a urine sample test positive for opiate drugs (OR= 0.36, 95% confidence internal 0.13–0.71: p~0.004). Opiate drug use in our patients was also significantly related to plasma methadone concentration, increasing noticeably when the drug concentration < 0.48 nmol/L (p~0.04). We found no relationship between methadone dose and odds of having a positive urine drug test in either clinic- or community-based patients. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|