首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

穿心莲药材不同提取方式的合理性评价
引用本文:王雅琪,伍振峰,郑琴,胡鹏翼,兰继平,张普照,杨明.穿心莲药材不同提取方式的合理性评价[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2014,20(10):1-5.
作者姓名:王雅琪  伍振峰  郑琴  胡鹏翼  兰继平  张普照  杨明
作者单位:江西中医药大学现代中药制剂教育部重点实验室, 南昌 330004;江西中医药大学现代中药制剂教育部重点实验室, 南昌 330004;成都中医药大学, 成都 611137;江西中医药大学现代中药制剂教育部重点实验室, 南昌 330004;江西中医药大学现代中药制剂教育部重点实验室, 南昌 330004;江西中医药大学现代中药制剂教育部重点实验室, 南昌 330004;江西中医药大学现代中药制剂教育部重点实验室, 南昌 330004;江西中医药大学现代中药制剂教育部重点实验室, 南昌 330004
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(81173565);江西中医药大学项目(20122R053);江西中医药大学重点学科项目(2013jzzdxk048)
摘    要:目的:比较不同穿心莲提取液中有效成分含量、指纹图谱和药效学活性。方法:采用减压提取法(VAE)、超声提取法(UAE)和传统提取法(HRE)制备提取液,利用HPLC对不同穿心莲提取物进行微观组分指纹图谱分析,流动相乙腈(A)-0.2%甲酸水溶液(B)梯度洗脱(0~20 min,10%~30%A;20~30 min,30%~35%A;30~40 min,35%~60%A;40~50 min,60%~85%A;50~60 min,85%~100%A),检测波长254 nm,结合DPPH自由基反应体系,考察不同工艺提取液的抗氧清除能力。结果:VAE对穿心莲药材中药效成分(穿心莲内酯、脱水穿心莲内酯)提取效率显著高于传统方法。3种提取液的指纹图谱均含有17个特征峰,VAE,HRE及UAE的相似度分别为0.957,0.911,0.905。清除DPPH自由基能力强弱顺序为VAE>UAE>HRE,当质量浓度为20 g·L-1时,DPPH清除率分别为44.85%,25.29%,16.58%。结论:穿心莲不同工艺提取液中药效成分不存在显著性差异。与传统提取法相比,VAE具有提取时间短、效率高、无污染等优点。VAE液对DPPH自由基清除效果优于HRE液和UAE液。

关 键 词:穿心莲  指纹图谱  DPPH  减压提取工艺  穿心莲内酯  脱水穿心莲内酯
收稿时间:2013/8/31 0:00:00

Rationality Evaluation of Different Extraction Technologies of Andrographis Herba
WANG Ya-qi,WU Zhen-feng,ZHENG Qin,HU Peng-yi,LAN Ji-ping,ZHANG Pu-zhao and YANG Ming.Rationality Evaluation of Different Extraction Technologies of Andrographis Herba[J].China Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2014,20(10):1-5.
Authors:WANG Ya-qi  WU Zhen-feng  ZHENG Qin  HU Peng-yi  LAN Ji-ping  ZHANG Pu-zhao and YANG Ming
Institution:Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of TCM, Nanchang 330004, China;Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of TCM, Nanchang 330004, China;Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu 611137, China;Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of TCM, Nanchang 330004, China;Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of TCM, Nanchang 330004, China;Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of TCM, Nanchang 330004, China;Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of TCM, Nanchang 330004, China;Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of TCM, Nanchang 330004, China
Abstract:Objective: To compare active ingredients contents,HPLC fingerprints and pharmacodynamics activities of different Andrographis Herba extracts. Method: Extracts were prepared by three different extraction technologies of vacuum-assist extraction(VAE),ultrasound-assist extraction(UAE) and heating reflux extraction(HRE),extraction efficiencies and micro-fingerprints analysis of extracts were investigated by HPLC,taking acetonitrile(A)-0.2% formic acid(B) (0-20 min,10%-30%A;20-30 min,30%-35%A;30-40 min,35%-60%A;40-50 min,60%-85%A;50-60 min,85%-100%A) as mobile phase for gradient elution,detection wavelength was set at 254 nm.Antioxidant activities of extracts were investigated by DPPH free radical reaction system. Result: Compared with traditional methods,extraction efficiencies of active ingredients(andrographolide and dehydroandrographolide) were higher by VAE.Analysis of HPLC fingerprint showed 17 main characteristic peaks in three different extracts,similarities of VAE,HRE and UAE were 0.957,0.911 and 0.905,respectively.DPPH free radical scavenging capacity was in the order of VAE>UAE>HRE,when the concentration of active ingredients was 20 g·L-1,DPPH clearance rates were 44.85%,25.29% and 16.58%,respectively. Conclusion: Active ingredients in different extracts of Andrographis Herba had no significant differences.Compared with traditional extracting methods,VAE had advantages,such as short extraction time,high efficiency,no pollution and so on.Scavenging effect of VAE solution on DPPH radical was better than HRE extract and UAE extract.
Keywords:Andrographis Herba  fingerprint  DPPH  vacuum-assist extraction process  andrographolide  dehydroandrographolide
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国实验方剂学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国实验方剂学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号