全文获取类型
收费全文 | 65篇 |
免费 | 14篇 |
专业分类
耳鼻咽喉 | 1篇 |
儿科学 | 2篇 |
基础医学 | 4篇 |
口腔科学 | 2篇 |
临床医学 | 18篇 |
内科学 | 11篇 |
皮肤病学 | 3篇 |
神经病学 | 5篇 |
特种医学 | 5篇 |
外科学 | 15篇 |
综合类 | 2篇 |
预防医学 | 4篇 |
药学 | 3篇 |
肿瘤学 | 4篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 5篇 |
2022年 | 4篇 |
2021年 | 4篇 |
2020年 | 3篇 |
2019年 | 3篇 |
2018年 | 8篇 |
2017年 | 6篇 |
2015年 | 1篇 |
2014年 | 2篇 |
2013年 | 5篇 |
2012年 | 3篇 |
2011年 | 5篇 |
2010年 | 3篇 |
2009年 | 1篇 |
2008年 | 5篇 |
2007年 | 1篇 |
2006年 | 1篇 |
2005年 | 3篇 |
2004年 | 4篇 |
2003年 | 2篇 |
2002年 | 1篇 |
2001年 | 3篇 |
1999年 | 1篇 |
1997年 | 2篇 |
1996年 | 1篇 |
1994年 | 1篇 |
1988年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有79条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
PurposeTo facilitate decision-making in authorship positions, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editor (ICMJE) developed a guideline that stipulates criteria authors should meet in order to merit authorship. Authors who did not meet these criteria and still enlisted as authors, are called ‘honorary’ authors. In this study, the prevalence and characteristics of honorary authorship (HA) is assessed in the field of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.MethodsA survey was distributed among corresponding authors of articles published in 2019 in six Orthopedics-dedicated journals.Results479 of the 1392 approached authors responded, leading to a response rate of 34.4%. 91.6% of the respondents were aware of the ICMJE guidelines, whereas 67.8% were aware of the issue of HA. Overall, the prevalence of guideline-based HA was 41.9%, while the prevalence of self-perceived HA was 14.7%. Having a senior member automatically enlisted as author on the departments, was associated with a higher rate of guideline-based HA (OR 5.03) and self-perceived HA (OR 3.31).ConclusionsThe prevalence of HA in the field of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine is high, but comparable to other medical fields. Transparency in authorship decision-making is crucial to maintain liability in scientific articles. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
BackgroundDespite the importance of diversity in advancing scientific progress, diversity among leading authors in arthroplasty has not been examined. This study aimed to identify, characterize, and assess disparities among leading authors in arthroplasty literature from 2002 to 2019.MethodsArticles published between 2002 and 2019 from 12 academic journals that publish orthopedic and arthroplasty research were extracted from PubMed. Original articles containing keywords related to arthroplasty were analyzed. Author gender was assigned using the Genderize algorithm. Gender and characterization of the top 100 male and female authors utilized available information on academic profiles.ResultsFrom the 14,692 articles that met inclusion criteria, the genders of 23,626 unique authors were identified. Women were less likely than men to publish 5 years after beginning their publishing careers (adjusted odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.57, P < .001). Of the top 100 authors, 96 were men, while only 4 were women. Orthopedic surgeons made up 93 of 100 top authors, of which 92 were men and 1 was a woman. Among the top 10 publishing female and male authors, 10 of 10 men were orthopedic surgeons, only 2 of 10 women were physicians, and only one was an attending orthopedic surgeon.ConclusionWhile the majority of authors with high arthroplasty publication volume were orthopedic surgeons, there were significant gender disparities among the leading researchers. We should continue working to increase gender representation and supporting the research careers of women in arthroplasty. 相似文献
5.
6.
Mauricio Palacios Gómez 《Colombia Médica》2012,43(3):182-183
7.
8.
9.
10.
Jason D. Lehman William W. Schairer Alex Gu Jason L. Blevins Peter K. Sculco 《The Journal of arthroplasty》2017,32(5):1684-1687