不同严重程度鼻炎患者尘螨舌下特异性免疫治疗临床效果观察

目的　评估不同严重程度变应性鼻炎（allergic rhinitis，AR）患儿进行规范化舌下特异性免疫治疗（sublingual immunotherapy， SLIT）的疗效。方法　选取2017年5—12月首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院耳鼻喉科就诊的3～14岁对粉尘螨过敏的AR患儿181例， 按治疗方式不同分为对照组（n＝92， 给予常规药物治疗）和SLIT组（n＝89， 给予尘螨特异性免疫治疗）； 采用AR评分标准， 根据患儿鼻部症状总评分（total nasal symptoms score， TNSS）， 将对照组分为轻度组（n＝35）、中度组（n＝28）和重度组（n＝29）；将SLIT分为轻度组（n＝27）、中度组（n＝33）和重度组（n＝29）。收集第6个月、 1年、 2年的随访数据， 分别对患儿进行TNSS、 鼻炎用药评分（total rhinitis medication scores， TRMS）和视觉模拟量表（visual analogue scale，VAS）评分。结果　（1）治疗2年后， SLIT组与对照组患儿TNSS评分分别为0.61±0.73、 1.61±1.17， TRMS分别为0.21±0.41、 0.59±0.70， VAS分别为0.63±0.70、 1.53±1.24， 两组间差异有统计学意义， Z值分别为6.269、 4.139、5.174， P值均＜0.05； （2）轻度组（n＝62）组内分析： SLIT组（n＝27）与对照组（n＝35）比较， 治疗6个月、 1年， 两组的TNSS、 TRMS、 VAS差异均无统计学意义（Z值分别为-0.108、 0.232、 0.788， 0.774、 0.033、 -0.718； P值均＞0.05）； 治疗2年时两组的TRMS、 VAS差异无统计学意义（Z值分别为0.230、 1.255， P＞0.05）， TNSS在两组间差异有统计学意义（Z值为2.528， P值均＜0.05）； （3）中度组（n＝61）组内分析： 与对照组（n＝28）比较， SLIT组（n＝33）治疗6个月， TRMS、 VAS在两组间差异均无统计学意义（Z值分别为-0.413、 0.412， P值均＞0.05）， 但两组的TNSS差异有统计学意义（Z值为2.397， P＜0.05）； 治疗1年、2年的TNSS、 TRMS、 VAS两组间比较， 差异均有统计学意义（Z值分别为4.952、 2.740、 3.293； 4.743、 2.505、 3.330； P值均＜0.05）； （4）重度组（n＝58）组内分析： 与对照组（n＝29）比较， SLIT组（n＝29）治疗6个月、 1年、 2年的TNSS、 TRMS、 VAS在两组间差异均有统计学意义（Z值分别为2.567、 2.086、 2.781， 4.996、 4.264、 2.756， 4.253、 4.480、 4.515， P值均＜0.05）。结论　采用标准化粉尘螨滴剂舌下治疗尘螨致敏AR患儿， 治疗2年可获得较单纯药物治疗更佳的疗效， 尤其在病情严重患儿，其获益更大。     

Current therapeutical strategies for allergic rhinitis

Introduction: Allergic rhinitis is a common condition with increasing prevalence and is associated with several comorbid disorders such as bronchial asthma and atopic dermatitis. If allergen avoidance is not possible, allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only causal treatment option.

Areas covered: This review focuses on current treatments and the future outlook for allergic rhinitis. Pharmacotherapy includes mast cell stabilizers, antihistamines, glucocorticosteroids (GCSs), leukotriene receptor antagonists, and nasal decongestants. Nasal GCSs are currently regarded as the most effective treatment and are considered first-line therapy together with non-sedating antihistamines. The new formulation MP29-02 combines the nasal GCS fluticasone propionate with azelastine in one single spray and has achieved greater improvements than those under monotherapy with modern GCSs or antihistamines. Furthermore, this review discusses allergen immunotherapy alone and in combination with modern monoclonal antibodies.

Expert opinion: Despite the variety of medications for allergic rhinitis, ranging from general symptomatic agents like GCSs or decongestants, to more specific ones like histamine receptor or leukotriene blockers, to causal therapy like immunotherapy, many patients still experience treatment failures or unsatisfactory results. The ultimate goal may be to endotype every downstream pathway separately in order to offer patients individualized, targeted therapy with specific antibodies against the respective pathway.     

The effects of grass pollen allergoid immunotherapy on clinical and immunological parameters in children with allergic rhinitis

Allergoid immunotherapy is a new form of allergen immunotherapy allowing safe administration of high allergen doses. There is limited information on the effects of allergoid immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis. To investigate the immunological and clinical effects of allergoid immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis due to grass pollen allergy. Children with allergic rhinitis were assigned to allergoid immunotherapy (n = 27) or control (n = 26, no immunotherapy) groups. Children in the immunotherapy group received seven injections of grass pollen allergoid immunotherapy before grass pollen season and continued to receive maintenance immunotherapy for 27 months. All patients were offered a pharmacotherapy regimen to be used on demand during the pollen seasons. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared between the immunotherapy and control groups. The rhinoconjunctivitis symptom-medication score and asthma symptom score were lower in the immunotherapy group after 1 yr of maintenance immunotherapy (p < 0.01 for both). Skin test reactivity and nasal reactivity as determined by nasal provocation testing for grass pollen were significantly decreased after 1 yr of immunotherapy (p < 0.001 for both). The seasonal increase in bronchial reactivity and nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein levels were prevented after the first year of immunotherapy (p < 0.05 for both). The seasonal increase in immunoglobulin (Ig)E decreased (p < 0.05) and grass-specific IgG, IgG(1) and IgG(4) increased significantly already at the end of the seven-injection build-up therapy (p < 0.001, for all). Interleukin (IL)-4 levels in the culture supernatants showed a steady decline from baseline at first and second year of immunotherapy (p < 0.001) but remained unchanged in the control group. Allergoid immunotherapy is an effective method in the treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in children and prevents the seasonal increase in bronchial hyper-reactivity. Changes in specific IgE and IgG levels and decreased IL-4 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture supernatants may account for the observed clinical effects.     

Skin test results and self-reported symptom severity in allergic rhinitis: the role of psychological factors

BACKGROUND: In allergic conditions, the degree of skin test reactivity does not always correlate with the severity of clinical symptoms. Additional factors may contribute to the reported symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between the magnitude of the skin prick test (SPT) response and the reported symptom severity in patients with allergic rhinitis and the possible modifying role of psychological factors. METHODS: One hundred four patients with allergic rhinitis and 23 with non-allergic rhinitis, classified according to their SPT response to 19 aeroallergens, were asked to rate the severity of five symptoms and to indicate whether their symptoms intensified on exposure to five common aeroallergens. They also completed a psychological questionnaire. Results Reported symptom severity of allergic rhinitis did not correlate with weal size for any of the aeroallergens tested or with the number of positive responses on SPT. It was not related to patient age, sex, or education. The reported symptoms severity correlated positively (0.29, P < 0.01) with reported symptom intensification on exposure to allergens. Moreover, both outcomes were positively associated with the psychological factors of hypochondriasis (0.20, P < 0.05 and 0.18, P < 0.05, respectively), and somatic awareness (0.24, P < 0.05 and 0.33, P < 0.01, respectively), but not with neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of symptoms experienced by patients with allergic rhinitis is apparently not related to the magnitude of SPT response, but rather to psychological factors of hypochondriasis and somatic awareness. Physicians should be aware of the contribution of psychological factors to patient perceptions of the intensity of symptoms and of the intensification of symptoms on their exposure to allergens.     

Local mucosal immunoglobulin E production: does allergy exist in non‐allergic rhinitis?

In this review, we critically evaluate the evidence for local IgE production in allergic rhinitis mucosa and the concept of local allergy in non-atopic idiopathic rhinitis. Significantly, fewer studies have focused on the disease pathways associated with non-allergic rhinitis compared with their allergic counterparts. Recently, there's been a revival of the hypothesis concerning the existence of local tissue-specific allergic disease confined to the nasal mucosa of some systemically non-atopic rhinitis subjects. Providing the evidence for local mucosal IgE production in allergic rhinitis is a pre-requisite to reviewing its existence in non-allergic rhinitis. In addition, practical and theoretical approaches useful in the detection of allergy in non-allergic rhinitis will be discussed. Furthermore, successful therapeutic regimens used in the treatment of non-allergic rhinitis will be examined as these could provide an insight into the underlying pathophysiology of this common but poorly understood disease.     

不同穴位针刺蝶腭神经节深度及方向的研究

目的:观测下关、颧髎、"蝶腭"穴的体表位置,及各穴至蝶腭神经节的针刺深度和针刺方向.方法:15具成年男性尸体,面部左右共30侧,对其面侧区进行由浅入深的解剖.以下关、颧髎、"蝶腭"穴各穴针刺至蝶腭神经节方向为穿刺入路,电动钻带克氏针穿刺延伸至对侧区域,坐标定位法测量各穴的对应穿刺点.结果:①体表位置:"蝶腭"穴与颧髎的体表距离为21 mm,与下关的体表距离为17 mm.②各穴针刺蝶腭神经节的深度:下关为49.9 mm,"蝶腭"穴为46.9 mm,颧髎为46.6 mm.③对应穿刺点坐标定位:下关针刺方向为前内上,对应于对侧的太阳和瞳子髎的中点处附近区域,对应穿刺点距对侧丝竹空的距离为17.6 mm;"蝶腭"穴针刺方向为后内上,对应穿刺点与颧弓水平线的距离为33 mm,与目外眦垂直线的距离为42 mm;颧髎针刺方向为后内上,对应穿刺点与两外耳门连线的距离为28 mm,头部正中线旁开62 mm.结论:了解下关、颧髎、"蝶腭"穴的体表位置、针刺深度、针刺方向,为临床针刺蝶腭神经节提供了依据.     

Allergic fungal sinusitis— A clinico-pathological study

The co-existence of fungal elements in allergic nasal Polyposis, has given rise to a distinct clinical entity known as ‘Allergic fungal sinusitis ’ (AF’S). Many a time, these fungal elements may not be diagnosed pre-operatively by routine diagnostic nasal endoscopy or CT scan of paranasal sinuses, due to the florid presentation of nasal polyps, which usually obscure the underlying fungal pathology. The diagnosis is often made intra-operatively. The post-operative confirmation of AFS is by histopathology, fungal smear, fungal culture, allergic murin study and fungal specific IgE titres. We report a series often such cases done in our institution, which highlight that AFS should be considered as a differential diagnosis in Sinonasal Polyposis cases, for their effective management.