Treatment consensus for management of polymyositis and dermatomyositis among rheumatologists,neurologists and dermatologists

Although rheumatologists, neurologists and dermatologists see patients with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM), their management appears to vary depending on the physician's specialty. The aim of the present study was to establish the treatment consensus among specialists of the three fields to standardize the patient care. We formed a research team supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. Clinical questions (CQ) on the management of PM and DM were raised. A published work search on CQ was performed primarily using PubMed. Using the nominal group technique, qualified studies and results in the published work were evaluated and discussed to reach consensus recommendations. They were sent out to the Japan College of Rheumatology, Japanese Society of Neurology and Japanese Dermatological Association for their approval. We reached a consensus in 23 CQ and made recommendations and a decision tree for management was proposed. They were officially approved by the three scientific societies. In conclusion, a multidisciplinary treatment consensus for the management of PM and DM was established for the first time.     

Non-clinical pharmacokinetic profiles of rovatirelin,an orally available thyrotropin-releasing hormone analogue

1. The non-clinical pharmacokinetic profiles of rovatirelin, a novel thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) analogue, were investigated in vivo and in vitro.

2. Rovatirelin orally administered to rats and dogs was rapidly absorbed and bioavailability was estimated to be 7.3 and 41.3%, respectively. The extent of plasma protein binding of rovatirelin in rats, dogs, and humans was low in all species (～15%). The permeability of rovatirelin from blood to brain (permeability-surface area) ranged from 1.04?±?0.14 to 1.29?±?0.28?μL/min/g in rats, and rovatirelin was stable in rat plasma and brain homogenates.

3. The metabolite pattern was qualitatively similar in vitro and in vivo. In animals, rovatirelin aminopentanoic acid (rovatirelin-acid), rovatirelin aminopentanone (rovatirelin-ketone), rovatirelin pyrrolidine (4S)-hydroxy (rovatirelin-OH), (thiazoylalanyl)methylpyrrolidine (TAMP), 3-(4-thiazoyl)-l-alanine (TA), and unknown metabolites were observed. In human hepatocytes, TAMP was mainly formed and no unique human metabolite was observed.

4. The radioactivity from administered [¹⁴C]rovatirelin was predominantly excreted in faeces in rats and dogs, and almost all radioactivity was recovered 168?h after administration. Absorption, brain penetration, and stability of rovatirelin in the brain were greater than for taltirelin.

5. Thus, orally administered rovatirelin is a potentially improved treatment for spinocerebellar degeneration compared with taltirelin.     

Granulomatous/sarcoid-like reactions in the setting of programmed cell death-1 inhibition: a potential mimic of disease recurrence

Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death 1 (PD-1). Although these agents are effective in treating advanced melanoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and other types of cancers, various adverse events have been reported. Cutaneous adverse events are particularly prevalent and, while granulomatous/sarcoid-like reactions are uncommon, they are increasingly recognized as immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we report two cases of granulomatous/sarcoid-like reaction with foreign material, mimicking metastatic malignancy after PD-1 inhibitor treatment. Clinicians should be aware of the existence of cutaneous lesions and perform biopsy if needed to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary adjustments to immunotherapy.     

Effects of α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists on the development and progression of urothelial cancer

We recently demonstrated that silodosin, a selective α₁-blocker often prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), could inactivate a c-fos proto-oncogene regulator ELK1 in bladder cancer cells possessing a functional androgen receptor (AR). However, the clinical impact of α₁-blockers on the development and progression of bladder cancer remained poorly understood. In the present study, we investigated if α₁-blockers clinically used, including silodosin, tamsulosin, and naftopidil, could prevent the neoplastic/malignant transformation and cell growth, using non-neoplastic urothelial SVHUC sublines with carcinogen/MCA challenge and bladder cancer lines, respectively. Bladder cancers in men treated with silodosin, tamsulosin, or naftopidil for their BPH were then compared. Silodosin at 1-10 µM significantly inhibited the neoplastic transformation of MCA-SVHUC-AR cells, but not that of AR-negative MCA-SVHUC-control cells. In MCA-SVHUC-AR, silodosin significantly reduced the expression levels of oncogenes (c-fos/NF-κB1) and induced those of tumor suppressors (p27/PTEN). However, tamsulosin (up to 1 µM) or naftopidil (up to 10 µM) failed to significantly inhibit the neoplastic transformation of AR-positive or AR-negative urothelial cells. Similarly, cell proliferation/migration of AR-positive bladder cancer lines was considerably inhibited only by silodosin. Meanwhile, the incidence of bladder cancer in patients with silodosin [49/540 (9.1%)] was marginally lower, compared to those with tamsulosin [64/523 (12.2%); P=0.094] or tamsulosin or naftopidil [64+28/523+236 (12.1%); P=0.082]. There were no significant differences in tumor grade/stage among the 3 cohorts. Outcome analysis revealed lower risks for disease progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors in the silodosin group than in the naftopidil group (P=0.011) or tamsulosin+naftopidil groups (P=0.035). Similarly, silodosin patients with muscle-invasive tumor had lower risks for disease progression, compared with tamsulosin (P=0.006) or tamsulosin+naftopidil (P=0.028) patients. Multivariate analysis further showed that silodosin treatment in those with non-muscle-invasive tumor was associated with improved progression-free survival, compared with naftopidil (hazard ratio=0.086; 95% confidence interval=0.008-0.905; P=0.041) or tamsulosin/naftopidil (hazard ratio=0.128; 95% confidence interval=0.016-1.036; P=0.054) treatment. Our in vitro studies thus indicate that both urothelial tumorigenesis and tumor growth are inhibited by silodosin, but not by tamsulosin or naftopidil. Clinical data further suggest that even pharmacological doses (e.g. 0.1 µM) of silodosin contribute to preventing bladder cancer progression.