Robotic Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications

Study ObjectiveThe Hominis surgical system is a novel robot-assisted system, designed specifically for robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (RvNOTES). We presented our experience of the first 30 RvNOTES hysterectomies assessing the feasibility and safety of this technology.DesignA two-center prospective study.SettingAcademic tertiary referral centers. The ethics committees approved the study in both centers.PatientsThirty women with benign indication for hysterectomy.InterventionRvNOTES hysterectomy performed by the Hominis surgical system.Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary outcome of the study was the rate of conversion to open or conventional laparoscopic approaches. Secondary outcomes included intra- and postoperative adverse events, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and 6-week follow-up assessment. A total of 15 women were enrolled at each site. The median age was 59 years (range: 37–79) and the median body mass index was 25.4 kg/m² (range: 17.6–40.0). Twenty-four women (80%) had comorbidities. All the procedures were completed successfully without conversion to open abdominal, traditional vaginal, or conventional laparoscopic surgery. No intraoperative complications were observed. Median blood loss and procedure duration were 50 mL (range: 20–400) and 57 minutes (range: 24–88), respectively. Postoperative pain was minimal, with a median visual analog scale of 3 (range: 1–5) for the first 24 hours following surgery. The median hospital stay was 3 days (range: 2–8). According to the treating physicians’ evaluations, the vaginal cuff was fully healed in all patients at the 6-week postoperative follow-up visit.ConclusionsThis is the first publication of robot-assisted vaginal hysterectomy using the Hominis surgical system. The positive results of this study show this new technology to be a safe and effective tool for vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, enabling surgeons to operate vaginally with the known advantages of robotic modality.     

The Safety and Efficacy of Approaches to Liver Resection: A Meta-Analysis

Background:The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of conventional laparotomy with those of robotic and laparoscopic approaches to hepatectomy.Database:Independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of publications in PubMed and Embase, with searches limited to comparative articles of laparoscopic hepatectomy with either conventional or robotic liver approaches. Outcomes included total operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, resection margins, postoperative complications, perioperative mortality rates, and cost measures. Outcome comparisons were calculated using random-effects models to pool estimates of mean net differences or of the relative risk between group outcomes. Forty-nine articles, representing 3702 patients, comprise this analysis: 1901 (51.35%) underwent a laparoscopic approach, 1741 (47.03%) underwent an open approach, and 60 (1.62%) underwent a robotic approach. There was no difference in total operative times, surgical margins, or perioperative mortality rates among groups. Across all outcome measures, laparoscopic and robotic approaches showed no difference. As compared with the minimally invasive groups, patients undergoing laparotomy had a greater estimated blood loss (pooled mean net change, 152.0 mL; 95% confidence interval, 103.3–200.8 mL), a longer length of hospital stay (pooled mean difference, 2.22 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.78–2.66 days), and a higher total complication rate (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.42–0.57).Conclusion:Minimally invasive approaches to liver resection are as safe as conventional laparotomy, affording less estimated blood loss, shorter lengths of hospitalization, lower perioperative complication rates, and equitable oncologic integrity and postoperative mortality rates. There was no proven advantage of robotic approaches compared with laparoscopic approaches.     

The immediate effect of changing mandibular position on the EMG activity of the masseter, temporalis, sternocleidomastoid, and trapezius muscles

This study investigated the immediate effect of changing mandibular position on the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the masseter (MS), temporalis (TM), sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and trapezius (TR) muscles. Thirty-three (33) asymptomatic subjects (16 males and 17 females), ages 23 to 52 were selected. Surface EMG recordings were obtained for all muscles bilaterally with the mandible in a relaxed open position (relaxed) and during maximal voluntary clenching (fullbite) for the following: a non-repositioning appliance (NONREPOS) and repositioning appliance (REPOS). REPOS significantly reduced EMG activity of all muscles bilaterally during fullbite. During relaxation, reduction in EMG activity was only found for TR bilaterally. NONREPOS decreased the EMG activity bilaterally for TM and TR and unilaterally (left) for MS and SCM during fullbite. During relaxation, NONREPOS decreased muscle activity bilaterally for TR and SCM. A unilateral reduction was found for TM (right). These findings suggest that immediate alterations in mandibular position affect the cranio-cervical system. Both mandibular positions tested lowered the EMG activity of masticatory and cervical muscles in the relaxed and fullbite positions. The trapezius muscle was the most responsive to alterations in mandibular position.