Have the causes of maxillofacial fractures changed over the last 16 years in Finland? An epidemiological study of 725 fractures

Abstract –  A retrospective study was undertaken to assess causes of maxillofacial fractures in Helsinki in 1981 and 1997. Hospital records of 725 patients were analyzed according to several factors including age, sex, cause of fracture and time of the injury. The time intervals between the accident and hospital examination were also evaluated. Number of maxillofacial fractures was 318 in 1981 and 407 in 1997 (27.9% increase) and most patients were men. The male to female ratio was 2.8:1 in 1981, 3:1 in 1997. In 1981, most affected patients were in the age group of 31–40 years (33.2% of men, 28.9% of women). Sixteen years later the most affected age group was 41–50 years (23.3% of men, 30.4% of women). Assault was the cause of the injury in 42% of patients followed by traffic accidents (26%) and fall (17%). During the study period violence had become more severe in nature. Kicking as the cause of maxillofacial fracture increased by 7.3% and use of a weapon by 5.7% between the years studied. Bicycle accidents increased by 19.3% but motor vehicle accidents decreased by 31.6% between the years. Falls, and bicycle and pedestrian accidents were the causes that accounted for most of the increase in maxillofacial fracture. In 1997, maxillofacial fractures were slightly more common from June to August and from Friday to Sunday than at other times (45.2 and 50%, respectively).     

A follow-up EEG study in diabetic children

498 electroencephalograms (EEGs) were recorded from 195 diabetic children during a follow-up study. The children were divided into stable and labile groups according to diabetes control. The labile group was further subdivided into hypoglycaemic, ketoacidotic and mixed groups. In general it was found that the labile children had significantly more abnormal findings in their EEGs than the stable children, as expected. This applied particularly to generalized discharges with spikes and sharp waves or focal findings, but not to cases with only a diffuse-slowing. Nonstatistical differences in EEG abnormality were seen between the hypoglycaemic and ketoacidotic group--an unexpected finding. During the follow-up the labile group more often had an increasing EEG abnormality than the stable group. For those children who had an EEG abnormality but without an increasing tendency, there was no difference in the EEGs between the labile and stable children. It was concluded tht some of the EEG abnormalities are acquired, and apparently produced by a metabolic disturbance caused by diabetes. However, other causes may be of genetic or perinatal origin, or perhaps a combination of different causes. Because of the multifactorial aetiology of the abnormalities, EEG cannot at present be recommended for routine testing of the effects of metabolic disturbance in diabetics.     

Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)

Purpose: The present study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) among foot and ankle patients.

Methods: The LEFS was translated and cross-culturally adapted to Finnish. We assessed the test–retest reliability, internal consistency, floor-ceiling effect, construct validity and criterion validity in patients who underwent surgery due to musculoskeletal pathology of the foot and ankle (N?=?166).

Results: The test–retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91–0.95). The standard error of measurement was 4.1 points. The Finnish LEFS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α?=?0.96). A slight ceiling effect occurred as 17% achieved the maximum score. The LEFS correlation was strong with the 15D Mobility dimension (r?=?0.74) and overall HRQoL (r?=?0.66), pain during foot and ankle activity (r=??0.69) and stiffness (r=??0.62). LEFS correlated moderately with foot and ankle pain at rest (r=??0.50) and with physical activity (r?=?0.46).

Conclusions: The Finnish version of the LEFS showed reliability and validity comparable to those of the original version. This study indicates that the Finnish version of the LEFS serves both clinical and scientific purposes in assessing lower-limb function.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Finnish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing lower-extremity musculoskeletal disability in Finnish-speaking population.

• Investigation of the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the LEFS showed validity and reliability comparable to those of the original English version.

• The Finnish LEFS is easy to complete and suitable for clinical, rehabilitation and research purposes.

     

Quantitative ADME Proteomics – CYP and UGT Enzymes in the Beagle Dog Liver and Intestine

Pharmaceutical Research - Beagle dogs are used to study oral pharmacokinetics and guide development of drug formulations for human use. Since mechanistic insight into species differences is needed...     

Health-related quality of life in adults with hearing impairment before and after hearing-aid rehabilitation in Finland

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with hearing impairment in Finland before and after hearing rehabilitation. Design: The study was prospective with hearing-aid rehabilitation as the intervention. The data was collected, using the 15D instrument, before and six months after hearing-aid rehabilitation. The data was analysed using t-tests and multiple linear regression methods. Study sample: The study sample included 949 adults with hearing impairment, and the control group included a sample of age- and gender-standardized general population. Results: The study population had significantly poorer HRQoL on most dimensions of the 15D when compared to the control group both before and after hearing-aid rehabilitation. Hearing-aid rehabilitation resulted in improved mean scores on the dimensions of hearing and in the overall 15D score that were statistically significant, although the mean improvement in the overall score was marginal. Self-reported hearing ability can better predict the change in HRQoL, as a result of a hearing aid, when compared with measured hearing sensitivity. Conclusions: The study supports the hypothesis that on average, use of a unilateral hearing aid results in improved subjective hearing and marginal improvement in HRQoL in adults with hearing impairment.     

Resting‐state glutamatergic neurotransmission is related to the peak latency of the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) for duration deviants: An 1H‐MRS‐EEG study

Mismatch negativity (MMN), an ERP elicited by a deviant stimulus in a train of standard stimuli, has been suggested to be associated to glutamatergic neurotransmission, mediated by glutamatergic NMDA receptors. In this study, we examined the relationship between interindividual variation of ¹H‐MRS‐measured glutamate+glutamine (Glx) in the superior temporal gyrus and MMN for duration and frequency deviants in 19 healthy young adults (9 male). We found a significant relationship between the peak latency of the duration‐MMN peak and creatine‐scaled Glx (p = .0003, η² = .43), with increased Glx level being associated to earlier peak of the duration‐MMN (r = ?.63). In contrast, the amplitude of the duration‐MMN was not related to Glx. There was no significant relationship between Glx and the frequency‐MMN. The present study is the first to demonstrate that interindividual variation in the glutamatergic neurotransmission affects the MMN response in healthy individuals.     

Health-related quality of life in patients with common rheumatic diseases referred to a university clinic

The aim of the present study was to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with common rheumatic diseases referred to a rheumatology clinic and to compare it to the HRQoL of the general population. All patients with a new referral to the Department of Rheumatology of the Helsinki University Central Hospital were asked to participate in the study during the period from May 2002 to April 2003. A total of 295 patients with various rheumatic diseases were included in the analysis: 99 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 47 with arthralgia and fibromyalgia, 43 with other chronic arthritis (spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, enteropathic arthritis), 44 with osteoarthritis (OA), 22 with active reactive arthritis (ReA), 17 with systemic rheumatic diseases, 9 adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and 14 with other diagnoses. HRQoL was measured by a disease specific instrument, the Stanford health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and by a generic instrument, 15D. The mean baseline 15D score of the 295 included patients (0.822, SD 0.114) was significantly lower than of the general population (0.903, SD 0.098). Patients with OA and chronic arthritis reported the poorest HRQoL scores (both 0.810 on a 0-1 scale). In patients with RA and ReA the 15D score improved in a statistically significant and clinically important manner during the 8-month follow-up. Discomfort and symptoms caused by the disease were alleviated in a statistically significant manner in patients with RA as well as in those with arthralgia and fibromyalgia, chronic arthritis, ReA and systemic rheumatic diseases. HAQ score improved significantly in patients with RA, arthralgia and fibromyalgia, and ReA. The HRQoL of patients with common rheumatic diseases at referral to rheumatology clinic is significantly lower than the HRQoL of age-standardized general population. The most affected patients are those with OA, chronic arthritis and RA. A significant improvement in HRQoL with conventional interventions was achieved in patients with RA and ReA.