Surgery or Conservative Treatment of Forearm in Patients Diagnosed with Pediatric Floating Elbow? Retrospective Analysis of 60 Consecutive Cases

BackgroundThe coexistence of supracondylar humerus fracture and forearm fracture is a rare trauma (3–13%) and it is called floating elbow. The aim of this study is to clinically compare the treatment outcomes of the patients diagnosed with floating elbow who underwent surgical treatment and who were followed up forearm with immobilization with splint.Materials and MethodsWhen scanned retrospectively, 60 patients who were treated with the diagnosis of floating elbow due to traumatic causes and followed up for at least 1 year were included in our study. Surgical treatment was performed on 42 patients for forearm fracture. Eighteen patients followed up with immobilization with a long arm splint. The results were evaluated according to the criteria modified by Templeton and Graham, in comparison with the patient’s intact side.ResultsIn the patients whose forearms were followed up conservatively, the mean age was 5.67 ± 2.25 years, and the mean follow-up period was 62.17 ± 45.91 months. In the patients who underwent surgery for the forearm, the mean age was 8.79 ± 2.01 years, and the mean follow-up was 47.14 ± 34.25 months. Eighteen patients whose forearms followed up conservatively, 12 had excellent and good clinical results and 6 had poor and moderate clinical results. Excellent and good clinical results in 27 patients who underwent surgical treatment for their forearms, moderate and poor clinical results obtained in 15 of them. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.357).ConclusionsIn conclusion, satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes can be obtained with immobilization of the forearm fracture with splint, if acceptable reduction can be provided for the forearm following fixation of the supracondylar humerus fracture with the K-wire for treatment of floating elbow injury.     

Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain, and good cosmesis, CME is technically demanding and carries the risk of severe complications. This study aims to compare the clinical, pathological, and oncological results of open and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME.The data of 76 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with CME and high vascular ligation were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the open or laparoscopic technique was used.Thirty-two patients underwent open right hemicolectomy, and 44 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, abdominal surgical history, tumor localization, and operation time. No significant differences were found regarding the specimen length, tumor size, harvested lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, or tumor grade. According to the Clavien–Dindo classification system, the laparoscopic group had significantly fewer complications than did the open group (11.4% vs 31.2%; P = .04). The open group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than did the laparoscopic hemicolectomy group (9.9 ± 4.7 vs 7.2 ± 3.1 days; P = .002). In addition, the groups were similar with respect to disease-free survival (P = .14) and overall survival (P = .06).The data in this study demonstrated that no differences exist between the open and laparoscopic techniques concerning pathological and oncological results. However, significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of hospital stay were observed in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation is a safe and feasible surgical procedure and should be considered the standard technique for right-sided colon cancer.     

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Previous Prostate Surgery

Background and Objectives:

Our objective is to clarify the effect of previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or open prostatectomy (OP) on surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods:

Between August 1, 2009, and March 31, 2013, 380 patients underwent RARP. Of these, 25 patients had undergone surgery for primary bladder outlet obstruction (TURP, 20 patients; OP, 5 patents) (group 1). A match-paired analysis was performed to identify 36 patients without a history of prostate surgery with equivalent clinicopathologic characteristics to serve as a control group (group 2). Patients followed up for 12 months were assessed.

Results:

Both groups were similar with respect to preoperative characteristics, as mean age, body mass index, median prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, clinical stage, the biopsy Gleason score, D''Amico risk, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score, the International Prostate Symptom Score, continence, and potency status. RARP resulted in longer console and anastomotic time, as well as higher blood loss compared with surgery-naive patients. We noted a greater rate of urinary leakage (pelvic drainage, >4 d) in group 1 (12% vs 2,8%). The anastomotic stricture rate was significantly higher in group 1 (16% vs 2.8%). No difference was found in the pathologic stage, positive surgical margin, and nerve-sparing procedure between the groups. Biochemical recurrence was observed in 12% (group 1) and 11.1% (group 2) of patients, respectively. No significant difference was found in the continence and potency rates.

Conclusions:

RARP after TURP or OP is a challenging but oncologically promising procedure with a longer console and anastomosis time, as well as higher blood loss and higher anastomotic stricture rate.     

Supraclavicular artery flap

Supraclavicular artery-based flaps provide aesthetic and functional coverage for the head and neck region. Fourteen formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected bilaterally, and 28 supraclavicular arteries were evaluated. The origin of the supraclavicular artery was transverse cervical artery in 62.9% and suprascapular artery in 37.1% of the cases. The origin of the artery was at the level of the medial third of the clavicle in 3.7%; 3.7% of the cases were at the junction of medial and middle third of the clavicle, 33.3% at the level of middle third of the clavicle, 11.1% at the junction of middle and lateral thirds, 44.4% at the level of lateral third, and 3.7% at the level of acromioclavicular joint. The mean values of the results were as follows: The diameter of the artery was 1.0 mm at the origin. The distance of the origin of the artery from sternoclavicular joint and from the upper border of the clavicle was 76.4 and 22.2 mm, respectively. The average length of the artery was 70.8 mm. In all dissections, the artery was deep to the platysma muscle. Forty-one percent of supraclavicular arteries accompanied the middle supraclavicular nerve, whereas 59% of the arteries run with lateral supraclavicular nerve. The supraclavicular artery had a parallel course to the 2 horizontal imaginary lines passing from the coracoid process and acromion in 63% of the cases; 18.5% of the arteries were oblique, and 18.5% were vertical to the imaginary lines. The venae comitantes were double in all dissections.