Game theoretical mapping of white matter contributions to visuospatial attention in stroke patients with hemineglect

White matter bundles linking gray matter nodes are key anatomical players to fully characterize associations between brain systems and cognitive functions. Here we used a multivariate lesion inference approach grounded in coalitional game theory (multiperturbation Shapley value analysis, MSA) to infer causal contributions of white matter bundles to visuospatial orienting of attention. Our work is based on the characterization of the lesion patterns of 25 right hemisphere stroke patients and the causal analysis of their impact on three neuropsychological tasks: line bisection, letter cancellation, and bells cancellation. We report that, out of the 11 white matter bundles included in our MSA coalitions, the optic radiations, the inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus and the anterior cingulum were the only tracts to display task‐invariant contributions (positive, positive, and negative, respectively) to the tasks. We also report task‐dependent influences for the branches of the superior longitudinal fasciculus and the posterior cingulum. By extending prior findings to white matter tracts linking key gray matter nodes, we further characterize from a network perspective the anatomical basis of visual and attentional orienting processes. The knowledge about interactions patterns mediated by white matter tracts linking cortical nodes of attention orienting networks, consolidated by further studies, may help develop and customize brain stimulation approaches for the rehabilitation of visuospatial neglect.     

Social dimension and complexity differentially influence brain responses during feedback processing

Recent research emphasizes the importance of social factors during performance monitoring. Thus, the current study investigated the impact of social stimuli -such as communicative gestures- on feedback processing. Moreover, it addressed a shortcoming of previous studies, which failed to consider stimulus complexity as potential confounding factor. Twenty-four volunteers performed a time estimation task while their electroencephalogram was recorded. Either social complex, social non-complex, non-social complex, or non-social non-complex stimuli were used to provide performance feedback. No effects of social dimension or complexity were found for task performance. In contrast, Feedback-Related Negativity (FRN) and P300 amplitudes were sensitive to both factors, with larger FRN and P300 amplitudes after social compared to non-social stimuli, and larger FRN amplitudes after complex positive than non-complex positive stimuli. P2 amplitudes were solely sensitive to feedback valence and social dimension. Subjectively, social complex stimuli were rated as more motivating than non-social complex ones. Independently of each other, social dimension and visual complexity influenced amplitude variation during performance monitoring. Social stimuli seem to be perceived as more salient, which is corroborated by P2, FRN and P300 results, as well as by subjective ratings. This could be explained due to their given relevance during every day social interactions.     

Naphthylphthalamic acid associates with and inhibits PIN auxin transporters

N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) is a key inhibitor of directional (polar) transport of the hormone auxin in plants. For decades, it has been a pivotal tool in elucidating the unique polar auxin transport-based processes underlying plant growth and development. Its exact mode of action has long been sought after and is still being debated, with prevailing mechanistic schemes describing only indirect connections between NPA and the main transporters responsible for directional transport, namely PIN auxin exporters. Here we present data supporting a model in which NPA associates with PINs in a more direct manner than hitherto postulated. We show that NPA inhibits PIN activity in a heterologous oocyte system and that expression of NPA-sensitive PINs in plant, yeast, and oocyte membranes leads to specific saturable NPA binding. We thus propose that PINs are a bona fide NPA target. This offers a straightforward molecular basis for NPA inhibition of PIN-dependent auxin transport and a logical parsimonious explanation for the known physiological effects of NPA on plant growth, as well as an alternative hypothesis to interpret past and future results. We also introduce PIN dimerization and describe an effect of NPA on this, suggesting that NPA binding could be exploited to gain insights into structural aspects of PINs related to their transport mechanism.

Many aspects of plant growth are controlled by the hormone auxin. A distinct feature of auxin is that its hormonal action requires it to be actively transported between cells and ultimately throughout the whole plant in a controlled directional or polarized manner, a process known as polar auxin transport (PAT). The ability of plants to perform PAT is ascribed to the auxin export activity of PIN transporters (1). Plasma membrane PINs can be restricted to a specific side of cells (2), and when this polarity is maintained in continuous plant cell files, the combined activity of identically localized PINs results in auxin flowing in that direction (3). This lays the vectorial foundations for PAT to create local auxin gradients and plant-wide PAT streams that are critical for auxin action and normal plant growth (4, 5).Synthetic PAT inhibitors such as N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) were initially developed as herbicides and then subsequently exploited by researchers to identify and characterize the unique PAT-based mechanisms that drive plant development (6). Having been used for over six decades, the question as to how NPA actually inhibits PAT has been keenly pursued. Several putative modes of action have been proposed, but the topic remains to date not fully or satisfactorily resolved (6).Early studies established NPA binding with high affinity to membrane-integral components of plant membranes (7–10). With the later discovery of pin1 mutants bearing their distinct bare inflorescences reminiscent of NPA-treated plants (11), followed by identification of the PIN gene family and gradual confirmation that PINs were NPA-sensitive auxin transporters that mediated PAT (1–5), it was apparent that the physiological and genetic evidence overwhelmingly linked NPA to inhibition of PIN activity (6). However, direct molecular association of NPA with PINs has never been reported (6). Instead, a substantial body of data has accumulated suggesting that the NPA target is not PIN itself, but rather other proteins or complexes that either actively coparticipate in PAT or are indirectly involved in control of PAT components (6, 12). Members of the B-family of ABC transporters, such as ABCB1 and ABCB19, showed high-affinity NPA binding and NPA-sensitive auxin export (1, 12–15), thus leading to proposals that they may either physically interact with PINs, or functionally interact such that their nonpolar auxin export activity contributes to PAT and/or to regulation of PINs (12, 16). In these scenarios, PIN/PAT would be rendered vulnerable to the NPA sensitivity of ABCB. However, these schemes are not yet fully resolved, are not fully consistent with key genetic and physiological data (6), and are particularly obfuscated by ABCB1/19 functioning both interactively and independently from PINs (1, 12, 15–20), with ABCB-PIN interaction occurring in an as-yet-unclarified manner (15, 18).A further twist in assigning ABCBs as the main NPA target is their regulation by their chaperone TWD1/FKBP42 (14, 16), with TWD1 itself also being an NPA-binding protein (14, 17). NPA interferes with this regulation and affects TWD1-ABCB interaction, but curiously NPA cannot bind stably to the ABCB-TWD1 complex (14, 17). As TWD1 has also been implicated in NPA-sensitive actin-based PIN trafficking (17), this has led to a model proposing that TWD1 could mediate the NPA sensitivities of both ABCB and PINs, thus presenting TWD1 as a modulator of PAT (17, 21). In an analogous scheme in some plant species, CYPA immunophilins such as tomato DGT, which are functionally similar to TWD1/FKBP42, are suggested to replace TWD1 in modulating auxin transporters and transducing NPA effects to PINs (12, 21).Similar to TWD1, BIG/TIR3 has also been associated with NPA and PIN trafficking (22). Given the undisputed role of trafficking in controlling PIN polarity (5), these reported effects warrant attention, although they are inconsistent with other reports that NPA perturbs neither vesicular trafficking nor actin dynamics in conditions where auxin transport is inhibited (23, 24). Together with trafficking, phosphorylation is another key modulator of PIN polarity as well as activity (5), so it is not surprising to find hypotheses suggesting that NPA could interfere with critical phosphorylation events (6), particularly as PID, a kinase crucial for PIN trafficking and activation, has also been connected to ABCB function and TWD1/ABCB/NPA interactions (25). Others propose that NPA may mimic natural compounds in their capacity as endogenous regulators of PAT, with plant flavonoids being suspected candidates (6, 26). Since flavonoids can compete with or inhibit ATP-binding in mammalian kinases and ABC transporters (27, 28), and as flavonoids can bind to and inhibit PID (25), a phosphorylation-based NPA mode of action would overlap with this hypothesis and poses the question whether NPA acts similarly as an ATP mimic.With these many potential NPA-affected pathways, there is a need to distinguish between low- and high-affinity NPA targets and possible secondary effects due to prolonged PAT inhibition. Current consensus is that low concentrations of NPA (<10 µM) cause direct inhibition of auxin transporters in PAT (21) and the consequent physiological effects seen in planta (IC₅₀ 0.1 to 10 µM) (7, 9, 19, 23, 29). This is associated with high-affinity binding to membranes (K_d 0.01 to 0.1 µM) (7, 8) and the inhibition of PIN/ABCB activity in short-term auxin transport assays (1, 14, 18, 20, 23). In contrast, NPA is thought to affect trafficking (21, 30) and other non-PAT processes (31) when used at higher doses (50 to 200 µM NPA), presumably via binding to its lower-affinity targets, although excessive NPA exposure may also have fast-acting toxic side effects (23). As the in vitro affinity of TWD1 for NPA is surprisingly low (K_d ∼100 µM) (17), the TWD1-mediated NPA effects on PIN/PAT are thought to be of the low-affinity type and linked to trafficking perturbations (17, 21). However, as NPA is always externally applied to plants or cells, it is not clear how or where the drug distributes or accumulates, and thus there may be discrepancies between actual and reported/apparent effective concentrations, as might be the case for TWD1 (17). Finally, NPA also binds with low affinity to inhibit APM1, an aminopeptidase implicated in auxin-related plant growth, but as with trafficking effects, this low-affinity NPA interaction is not connected to direct regulation of PAT (31).Thus, the available data proffer various indirect mechanisms that could lead to NPA inhibition of PIN-mediated PAT, but the proposed schemes have complicating aspects and struggle at times to satisfactorily explain the prime effects of NPA. Here we propose an alternative simpler scenario involving a more direct link between NPA and PINs that would resolve some of these currently outstanding issues. We present evidence from heterologous transport assays, classical in situ membrane binding, and oligomerization studies which collectively suggest that NPA can interact directly in a high-affinity manner with PINs, leading to conformational or structural effects and inhibition of auxin export activity.