3-D Ultrasound Imaging Reliability of Measuring Dysplasia Metrics in Infants

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a hip abnormality that ranges from mild acetabular dysplasia to irreducible femoral head dislocations. While 2-D B-mode ultrasound (US)-based dysplasia metrics or disease metrics are currently used clinically to diagnose developmental dysplasia of the hip, such estimates suffer from high inter-exam variability. In this work, we propose and evaluate 3-D US-derived dysplasia metrics that are automatically computed and demonstrate that these automatically derived dysplasia metrics are considerably more reproducible. The key features of our automatic method are (i) a random forest-based learning technique to remove regions across the coronal axis that do not contain bone structures necessary for dysplasia-metric extraction, thereby reducing outliers; (ii) a bone segmentation method that uses rotation-invariant and intensity-invariant filters, thus remaining robust to signal dropout and varying bone morphology; (iii) a novel slice-based learning and 3-D reconstruction strategy to estimate a probability map of the hypoechoic femoral head in the US volume; and (iv) formulae for calculating the 3-D US-derived dysplasia metrics. We validate our proposed method on real clinical data acquired from 40 infant hip examinations. Results show a considerable (around 70%) reduction in variability in two key 3-D US-derived dysplasia metrics compared with their 2-D counterparts.     

Effect of obstructive sleep apnoea on retinal microvascular function: a randomised controlled trial

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Retinal microvascular endothelial dysfunction is thought to be of importance in the development of ocular vascular diseases....     

Impact of Design Changes in Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube) Devices for Patients Who Rely on Home-Based Blenderized Diets for Enteral Nutrition

Objective: Blenderized diets are gaining increasing popularity among enteral tube users. Connectors in gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are undergoing standardization to reduce misconnections. These standardized G-tubes are referred to as ENFit G-tubes. This study was performed to quantify the in vitro performance of existing (legacy) G-tubes and compare them with ENFit G-tubes for blenderized diets.

Method: Patient blenderized diet recipes and practices were obtained through patient advocacy groups. Different blenders and blending times were studied. Five legacy G-tube brands and three corresponding ENFit brands, sized between 14?Fr and 24?Fr, were studied under gravity and push modes of feeding.

Results: Considering both thin and thick blenderized gravity mode diets, an average increase in feeding time from 20?minutes to 32?±?18?minutes in transitioning from legacy to ENFit was observed with standard G-tubes, compared to 22?±?3.5?minutes for low profiles. For push-mode diets, a 60-second push with standard ENFit G-tubes was easier compared to standard legacy G-tubes (61%?±?21% as much force), but faster 5-second pushes required considerably more effort for ENFit standard G-tubes (167%?±?96%). Low-profile ENFit G-tubes required slightly less effort compared to low-profile legacies for both 60-second and 5-second pushes (72%?±?22% and 90%?±?19%, respectively). Clogging was common in both legacy and ENFit devices, particularly under gravity mode.

Conclusions: For a push mode of feeding, patients will largely be unimpacted after the transition to ENFit. For a gravity mode of feeding, some ENFit users may need higher-powered blenders and should expect increased feeding times.     

Comparison of Peripheral Blast Clearance and Day 14 Bone Marrow Biopsy in Predicting Remission Status and Survival After 7+3 Induction in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction

Induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline (7+3) remains the standard of care for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Project for Universal Management of Airways – part 1: concept and methods

Multiple professional groups and societies worldwide have produced airway management guidelines. These are typically targeted at the process of tracheal intubation by a particular provider group in a restricted category of patients and reflect practice preferences in a particular geographical region. The existence of multiple distinct guidelines for some (but not other) closely related circumstances, increases complexity and may obscure the underlying principles that are common to all of them. This has the potential to increase cognitive load; promote the grouping of ideas in silos; impair teamwork; and ultimately compromise patient care. Development of a single set of airway management guidelines that can be applied across and beyond these domains may improve implementation; promote standardisation; and facilitate collaboration between airway practitioners from diverse backgrounds. A global multidisciplinary group of both airway operators and assistants was assembled. Over a 3-year period, a review of the existing airway guidelines and multiple reviews of the primary literature were combined with a structured process for determining expert consensus. Any discrepancies between these were analysed and reconciled. Where evidence in the literature was lacking, recommendations were made by expert consensus. Using the above process, a set of evidence-based airway management guidelines was developed in consultation with airway practitioners from a broad spectrum of disciplines and geographical locations. While consistent with the recommendations of the existing English language guidelines, these universal guidelines also incorporate the most recent concepts in airway management as well as statements on areas not widely addressed by the existing guidelines. The recommendations will be published in four parts that respectively address: airway evaluation; airway strategy; airway rescue and communication of airway outcomes. Together, these universal guidelines will provide a single, comprehensive approach to airway management that can be consistently applied by airway practitioners globally, independent of their clinical background or the circumstances in which airway management occurs.