Das prozessierte EEG zur personalisierten Dosierung von Anästhetika während Allgemeinanästhesie

Die Anaesthesiologie - Die Elektroenzephalogramm(EEG)-gesteuerte Anästhesie ist aus modernen Operationssälen nicht mehr wegzudenken und hat sich als Standard-Monitoring etabliert. Viele...     

Derivation of occupational exposure limits: Differences in methods and protection levels

Frameworks for deriving occupational exposure limits (OELs) and OEL-analogue values (such as derived-no-effect levels [DNELs]) in various regulatory areas in the EU and at national level in Germany were analysed. Reasons for differences between frameworks and possible means of improving transparency and harmonisation were identified. Differences between assessment factors used for deriving exposure limits proved to be one important reason for diverging numerical values. Distributions for exposure time, interspecies and intraspecies extrapolation were combined by probabilistic methods and compared with default values of assessment factors used in the various OEL frameworks in order to investigate protection levels. In a subchronic inhalation study showing local effects in the respiratory tract, the probability that assessment factors were sufficiently high to protect 99% and 95% of the target population (workers) from adverse effects varied considerably from 9% to 71% and 17% to 87%, respectively, between the frameworks. All steps of the derivation process, including the uncertainty associated with the point of departure (POD), were further analysed with two examples of full probabilistic assessments. It is proposed that benchmark modelling should be the method of choice for deriving PODs and that all OEL frameworks should provide detailed guidance documents and clearly define their protection goals by stating the proportion of the exposed population the OEL aims to cover and the probability with which they intend to provide protection from adverse effects. Harmonisation can be achieved by agreeing on the way to perform the methodological steps for deriving OELs and on common protection goals.     

Implicit and explicit self-concept of neuroticism in borderline personality disorder

Purpose: In the past, research on personality in borderline personality disorder (BPD) used primarily questionnaires suggesting heightened neuroticism in BPD. Self-report instruments inform about the conscious or explicit self-concept. BPD patients are known to show negative distortion with exaggeration of negative affect in the self-report. Neuroticism represents a risk factor for mental disorders. Indirect measures are available that tap into the implicit self-concept of neuroticism. The implicit self-concept refers to individual differences in associative representations of the self. The present study examined for the first time the implicit in addition to the explicit self-concept of neuroticism in BPD.

Materials and methods: Female BPD patients (N?=?35) and healthy women (N?=?39) completed an implicit association test and the NEO-FFI personality inventory.

Results: BPD patients showed higher implicit and explicit neuroticism compared to controls. The group difference for explicit neuroticism was four times larger than that for implicit neuroticism. Presence of comorbid depressive disorder was positively correlated with implicit neuroticism. The IAT neuroticism showed excellent split-half reliability for BPD patients.

Conclusions: The present data suggest that BPD patients with comorbid clinical depression but not those without clinical depression differ from healthy individuals in their implicit self-concept of neuroticism. In the associative network, BPD patients with comorbid clinical depression exhibit stronger associations of the self with neuroticism-related characteristics, such as nervousness, fearfulness, and uncertainty than healthy individuals. Regardless of depression, BPD patients show increased explicit neuroticism. Our findings provide evidence that the IAT neuroticism can be applied reliably to BPD patients.     

Long-Term Follow-Up of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage Reveals a High Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation

Goal: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is the second-most common cause of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH), surpassed only by uncontrolled hypertension. We characterized the percentage, risk factors, and comorbidities of patients suffering from CAA-related ICH in relation to long-term outcomes. Material and Methods: We performed retrospective analyses and clinical follow-ups of individuals suffering from ICH who were directly admitted to neurosurgery between 2002 and 2016. Findings: Seventy-four of 174 (42%) spontaneous nontraumatic lobar ICH cases leastwise satisfied the modified Boston criteria definition for at least “possible CAA.” Females suffered a higher risk of CAA-caused ICH (42 of 74, 56.8%, P= .035). Atrial fibrillation as a major comorbidity was observed in 19 patients (25.7%). Recovery (decrease of modified Rankin scale [mRS]) was highest during hospitalization in the acute clinic. One-year mortality was as follows: 14 of 25 patients (56%) with probable CAA without supporting pathology, 6 of 18, and 8 of 31 patients with supporting pathology and possible CAA, respectively. Only 10 of 74 (13.6%) had favorable long-term outcomes (mRS ≤2). Increasing numbers of lobar hemorrhages, low initial Glasgow Coma Scale, and subarachnoid hemorrhage were significantly associated with poor survivability, whereas statins, antithrombotic agents, an intraventricular hemorrhage, and midline shift played seemingly minor roles. Conclusions: Symptomatic ICH is a serious stage in CAA progression with high mortality. The high incidence of concurrent atrial fibrillation in these patients may support data on more widespread vascular pathology in CAA.     

Abdominal stab wound injury in children: Do we need a different approach?

Background

Penetrating stab wounds in children are relatively rare and no clear recommendations for the optimal evaluation have been devised. An acceptable traditional approach to the patient with an abdominal stab wound who does not require urgent surgery is selective nonoperative management and serial exams. The use of routine computed tomography remains an actively utilized investigation for these patients at many institutions.

Predictors of survival following surgical resection of limited-stage small cell lung cancer

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative radiation (PORT), and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) have been individually examined in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of each adjuvant treatment modality when used in combination after surgical resection of SCLC.MethodsData were collected from 5 cancer centers on all patients with limited-stage SCLC who underwent surgical resection between 1986 and 2019. Univariate and multivariable models were conducted to identify predictors of long-term outcomes, focusing on freedom from recurrence and survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT, and PCI.ResultsA total of 164 patients were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression analysis did not identify any adjuvant therapies to significantly influence recurrence in this cohort. Specifically, PORT was not associated with a significant influence on locoregional recurrence and PCI was not significantly associated with intracranial outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved survival in all stage I through III disease (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.81; P = .005) and even in pathologically node negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.91; P = .024). Although PCI was found to improve survival in univariate analysis, it was not significant in a multivariable model. PORT was not found to affect survival on either univariate or multivariable analysis.ConclusionsThis is among the largest multi-institutional studies on surgically resected limited-stage SCLC. Our results highlight survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, but did not identify a statistically significant influence from mediastinal PORT or PCI in our cohort. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the benefit of PORT or PCI in a surgically resected limited-stage SCLC population.