Functional and psychosocial impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatic patients’ quality of life in Saudi Arabia

Quality of Life Research - The COVID-19 pandemic might add to the stressors experienced by people living with rheumatic diseases. This study aimed to examine rheumatic patients’ functional...     

5-Oxoprolinase deficiency: report of the first human OPLAH mutation

Gamma-glutamyl cycle is a six-enzyme cycle that represents the primary pathway for glutathione synthesis and degradation. 5-Oxoprolinase deficiency is an extremely rare disorder of the gamma-glutamyl cycle with only eight patients reported to date. Debate continues as to whether this is a benign biochemical defect because of the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation which ranges from normal to significant neurological involvement. Here, we report the first molecularly characterized patients with 5-oxoprolinase deficiency due to a mutation in OPLAH (which encodes 5-oxoprolinase). The largely benign clinical course of the patients described herein despite persistent 5-oxoprolinuria highlights the importance of establishing a molecular diagnosis in the few cases with abnormal neurological outcome to exclude potentially overlapping biochemical defects and to explore potential genotype/phenotype correlation.     

Prevalence of fatigue functional and social impairment among patients with rheumatic diseases compared to patients without: A cross-sectional comparison

Rheumatic diseases (RD) are chronic diseases that significantly affect the lives of patients. Assessing health outcomes through a patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) is essential for RD management. Moreover, these tend to be less favorable among individuals than among the rest of the population. This study aimed to compare PROMIS between RD patients and other patients. This cross sectional study was conducted in the year 2021. Information about patients with RD was obtained from the RD registry at King Saud University Medical City. Patients without RD were recruited from family medicine clinics. Patients were contacted electronically through WhatsApp^© to complete the PROMIS surveys. We compared the individual PROMIS scores between the 2 groups using linear regression, adjusting for sex, nationality, marital status, education level, employment, family history of RD, income, and chronic comorbidities. There were 1024 individuals (512 with RD and 512 without RD). The most common RD was systemic lupus erythematosus (51.6%), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (44.3%). Individuals with RD reported significantly higher PROMIS T-scores for pain [β = 6.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.76, 7.71] and fatigue (β = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.37, 4.38) compared to those without RD. Moreover, RD individuals reported lower physical functioning (β = −5.4; 95% CI = −6.50, −4.24) and social interaction (β = −4.5; 95% CI = −5.73, −3.20). Patients with RD in Saudi Arabia, particularly those with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, have significantly greater impairment in physical functioning and social interaction and report higher levels of fatigue and pain. Addressing and ameliorating these negative outcomes is necessary to improve quality of life.     

Differential Benefits of Amoxicillin–Metronidazole in Different Phases of Periodontal Therapy in a Randomized Controlled Crossover Clinical Trial

Background : The specific advantage of administering systemic antibiotics during initial, non‐surgical therapy or in the context of periodontal surgery is unclear. This study assesses the differential outcomes of periodontal therapy supplemented with amoxicillin–metronidazole during either the non‐surgical or the surgical treatment phase. Methods: This is a single‐center, randomized placebo‐controlled crossover clinical trial with a 1‐year follow‐up. Eighty participants with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans–associated moderate to advanced periodontitis were randomized into two treatment groups: group A, antibiotics (500 mg metronidazole plus 375 mg amoxicillin three times per day for 7 days) during the first, non‐surgical phase of periodontal therapy (T1) and placebo during the second, surgical phase (T2); and group B, placebo during T1 and antibiotics during T2. The number of sites with probing depth (PD) >4 mm and bleeding on probing (BOP) per patient was the primary outcome. Results: A total of 11,212 sites were clinically monitored on 1,870 teeth. T1 with antibiotics decreased the number of sites with PD >4 mm and BOP per patient significantly more than without (group A: from 34.5 to 5.7, 84%; group B: from 28.7 to 8.7, 70%; P <0.01). Twenty patients treated with antibiotics, but only eight treated with placebo, achieved a 10‐fold reduction of diseased sites (P = 0.007). Consequently, fewer patients of group A needed additional therapy, the mean number of surgical interventions was lower, and treatment time in T2 was shorter. Six months after T2, the mean number of residual pockets (group A: 2.8 ± 5.2; group B: 2.2 ± 5.0) was not significantly different and was sustained over 12 months in both groups. Conclusion: Giving the antibiotics during T1 or T2 yielded similar long‐term outcomes, but antibiotics in T1 resolved the disease quicker and thus reduced the need for additional surgical intervention.     

Changes in healthcare workers’ knowledge,attitudes, practices,and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an unprecedented health crisis around the world, not least because of its heterogeneous clinical presentation and course. The new information on the pandemic emerging daily has made it challenging for healthcare workers (HCWs) to stay current with the latest knowledge, which could influence their attitudes and practices during patient care.This study is a follow-up evaluation of changes in HCWs’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices as well as anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic. Data were collected through an anonymous, predesigned, self-administered questionnaire that was sent online to HCWs in Saudi Arabia.The questionnaire was sent to 1500 HCWs, with a 63.8% response rate (N = 957). The majority of respondents were female (83%), and the most common age group was 31 to 40 years (52.2%). Nurses constituted 86.3% of the respondents. HCWs reported higher anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic which increased from 4.91 ± 2.84 to 8.6 ± 2.27 on an 11-point Likert scale compared to other viral outbreaks. HCWs believed that their own preparedness as well as that of their hospital''s intensive care unit or emergency room was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic than during the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus pandemic (2012–2015). About 58% of HCWs attended one or more simulations concerning the management of COVID-19 patients in their intensive care unit/emergency room, and nearly all had undergone N95 mask fit testing. The mean score of HCWs’ knowledge of COVID-19 was 9.89/12. For most respondents (94.6%), the perception of being at increased risk of infection was the main cause of anxiety related to COVID-19; the mean score of anxiety over COVID-19 increased from 4.91 ± 2.84 before to 8.6 ± 2.27 during the pandemic in Saudi Arabia.HCWs’ anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 have increased since a pandemic was declared. It is vital that healthcare facilities provide more emotional and psychological support for all HCWs.