Early diagnosis of cancer by imaging: The primary care perspective

The United Kingdom (UK) performs relatively badly in cancer survival, much of which underperformance is attributed to delays in diagnosis. As a result, increased access to cancer diagnostics for general practitioners is proposed. Four cancer sites and their associated tests have been chosen: lung/chest X-ray, colorectal/colonoscopy, ovarian/trans-vaginal ultrasound and brain tumours/MRI scanning. This article elaborates on the need for these, which patients are likely to be chosen for investigation, and the effect this will have on radiology departments.     

Hyperdense pericardial effusion in dermatomyositis and contrast induced nephropathy

Pericardial involvement in dermatomyositis is rare and usually asymptomatic. In many instances, a diagnosis of pericardial involvement is not found until autopsy. Renal failure associated with connective tissue disorders can result in or potentially exaggerate pericardial inflammation. We report an unusual case of high-density pericardial effusion in a patient with dermatomyositis consequent upon contrast nephropathy as demonstrated by computed tomography. High-density pericardial effusion can be a result of an insidious cause such as pericardial inflammation rather than the more usual causes such as coronary or cardiac perforation.     

Multi-detector row computed tomography: imaging in acute aortic syndrome

Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) encompass a spectrum of emergencies. These include those non-traumatic disease entities of the aorta namely, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, intramural haematoma, dissection and aneurysm rupture. The various types of AAS cannot be reliably differentiated on clinical grounds alone. Acute thoracic aortic injury is usually included in this group even though clinical presentation is different, i.e., in the context of trauma, the imaging features are very similar. Differentiation of AAS from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is important, however, it must be remembered that ACS may occur as a result of AAS. Now electrocardiogram (ECG)-gating technology is widely available, ECG-gated multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) is a powerful clinical tool in the acute emergency setting, which enables rapid and specific diagnosis of aortic pathology. ECG-gated MDCT significantly reduces motion artefact, avoids potential pitfalls in diagnosis and often provides diagnostic information about the coronary arteries. It should be used as a first-line imaging technique. This article examines the role of MDCT imaging and cardiac gating in the assessment of AAS and discusses the differentiation of this spectrum of aortic diseases with reference to the key imaging findings as obtained by experience in our institution.     

Multi-detector row computed tomography: imaging the coronary arteries

Over the last 2 years, multi-detector row computed tomographic (MDCT) cardiac imaging has continued to rapidly develop and evolve from the experimental research setting to become a useful clinical tool. The increasing availability of MDCT presents today's clinicians with an additional non-invasive diagnostic cardiac imaging method, in particular for the coronary arteries. With the advent and increasing clinical use of 16-detector row machines, and now with the imminent clinical emergence of 64-channel machines, the improvements in spatial and temporal resolution and sophisticated ECG-gating are allowing motion-free, fast, accurate, detailed, contrast-enhanced cardiac imaging that begins to approach the accuracy of traditional invasive diagnostic techniques. Additional diagnostic information may also be provided.     

Multidetector row CT angiography of the lower limb arteries: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered techniques and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography

AIM: To assess whether multi-detector CT angiograms (MDCTA) of the lower limb arteries, compared with conventional digital subtraction angiograms (DSA), could replace invasive arteriography in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective comparative analysis of MDCTA and DSA in 44 patients, MDCTA was analyzed using volume-rendered images acquired at a workstation and viewed in tandem with the original axial data. Designated arterial segments were graded according to their degree of stenosis. RESULTS: We found agreement for the degree of stenosis in 88.8% and 85.4% of 1024 segments analysed for two observers. The sensitivity for treatable lesions (>50% stenosis) was 79.1% and 72% with a specificity of 93.3% and 92.6%. DSA failed to visualize 7.3% of segments that were visible with MDCTA. These segments were exclusively downstream to long segment occlusions. CONCLUSION: MDCTA using 4-slice machines is insensitive to detecting significant arterial stenoses in the lower limb arteries. MDCTA is superior to DSA in its visualization of arterial territories downstream to significant occlusive disease.     

A comparison of a 'J' wire and a straight wire in successful antegrade cannulation of the superficial femoral artery

AIMS: To evaluate the success of two different types of wire in common use in their ability to successfully cannulate the superficial femoral artery (SFA) using antegrade puncture. METHODS: 50 consecutive patients in whom antegrade infra-inguinal intervention was planned, underwent common femoral arterial puncture and then cannulation with either a standard 3mm 'J' wire or a floppy tipped straight wire (William Cook-Europe). The frequency with which each type of wire entered the SFA or profunda femoris artery without image guidance was recorded. Further analysis was also made of the success of manipulation of the wire into the SFA following profunda cannulation and the use of alternative guide wires. RESULTS: In 19 out of 25 (76%) patients the 'J' wire correctly entered the SFA without image guidance. Only 5 out of 25 (25%) of straight wires entered the SFA with the initial pass (p < 0.0001). Following further manipulation with the same wire all except 1 'J' wire was successfully negotiated into the SFA. The same was true for only 9 of the remaining straight wires with 11 patients requiring an alternative guide wire. CONCLUSIONS: When performing antegrade cannulation of the SFA a 'J' wire is more likely to be successful than a straight guide wire.     

Efficacy and complications of Angioseal in antegrade puncture

AIM: Although arterial closure devices are in use for over a decade, there have been no specific study to assess the use of the same in antegrade puncture. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Consecutive patients undergoing antegrade puncture for peripheral vascular disease in a single centre performed by a single operator were included in this study. The notes and the angiograms were reviewed retrospectively for possible complications and the severity of disease. RESULT: Over a 25-month period, 21 patients with antegrade puncture had Angioseal deployed for haemostasis. Post-procedure complications recorded from the case notes showed one episode of haematoma formation and one case of worsening ischaemia. The severity of the disease at the puncture site did not influence the outcome. CONCLUSION: Use of Angioseal is safe and effective in antegrade punctures for peripheral vascular disease. The result is independent of the severity of disease at the puncture site.