Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) through Rasch analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Clinical Rheumatology - Central sensitization (CS) is a known contributor to chronic pain in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and is commonly measured by psychophysical testing or...     

Generalisierter Krampfanfall während der Anlage einer axillären Plexusblockade

Die Anaesthesiologie - Eine junge Patientin erleidet während der Anlage einer axillären Plexusblockade einen generalisierten Krampfanfall. Die Mechanismen, im Wesentlichen die vermutlich...     

Influence of Classroom-Level Factors on Implementation Fidelity During Scale-up of Evidence-Based Interventions

Prevention Science - As evidence-based interventions (EBIs) become more widely disseminated, fidelity of implementation (FOI) often wanes. This study explores the association between FOI and...     

Effects of Single-Dose Preemptive Pregabalin and Intravenous Ibuprofen on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Acute Pain after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Purpose: Non-opioid medications as a part of multimodal analgesia has been increasingly suggested in the management of acute post-surgical pain. The present study was planned to compare the efficacy of the combination of pregabalin plus ?v ibuprofen. Methods: 58 patients were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. The pregabalin group (Group P, n = 29) received 150 mg pregabalin, the pregabalin plus ibuprofen group (Gropu PI, n = 29) received 150 mg pregabalin and 400mg ?v ibuprofen before surgery. Postoperative fentanyl consumption, additional analgesia requirements and PACU stay were recorded. Postoperative analgesia was performed with patient-controlled IV fentanyl. Results: VAS scores in the group PI were statistically lower at PACU, 1and 2 hours at rest, at PACU, 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours on movement compared to the group P (P < 0.05). Opioid consumption was statistically significantly higher in the group P compared to the group PI (130.17 ± 60.27 vs 78.45 ± 60.40 μq, respectively, P < 0.001) and reduced in the 4th 24 hours by 55% in group PI. Rescue analgesia usage was statistically significantly higher in the group P than in the group PI (16/29 vs 7/29, respectively, P < 0.001). Four patient in the group PI did not need any opioid drug. Besides, PACU stay was shorter in the group PI than the group P (10.62 ± 2.38 vs 15.59 ± 2.11 min, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Preemptive pregabalin plus ?v ibuprofen in laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced postoperative opioid consumption. This multimodal analgesic aproach generated lower pain scores in the postoperative period.     

Extracapsular extension in oral cavity cancers—predictive factors and impact on recurrence pattern and survival

Extracapsular extension (ECE) has long been considered a poor prognostic factor in oral cavity cancer, the presence of which warrants intensification of adjuvant therapy. This study was done to analyze the survival of patients with ECE who received adjuvant chemoradiation. Patients with pathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, who were treated at a tertiary cancer centre in New Delhi, India during the years 2009–2017, were included. On multivariate analysis, ECE was significantly associated with depth of invasion >10 mm and tumour deposit size >5 mm. Among the node-positive group, patients without ECE had a 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) advantage over ECE-positive patients of 7.8% (63.8% vs. 56.0%) and 16.5% (87.2% vs. 70.7%), respectively. For patients with ECE, the hazard ratio for DFS and OS was 1.3 (95% confidence interval 0.97–1.75, P = 0.078) and 2.30 (95% confidence interval 1.35–3.92, P = 0.002), respectively. ECE remains one of the strongest predictors of recurrence and survival in oral cancer patients, and despite aggressive adjuvant therapy, distant recurrence is still significantly high.     

Three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: a clinical comparison of Dolphin,ProPlan CMF,and probabilistic finite element modelling

Three-dimensional surgical planning is used widely in orthognathic surgery. Although numerous computer programs exist, the accuracy of soft tissue prediction remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the prediction accuracy of Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, and a probabilistic finite element method (PFEM). Seven patients (mean age 18 years; five female) who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy with preoperative and 1-year postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were included. The three programs were used for soft tissue prediction using planned and postoperative maxillary position, and these were compared to postoperative CBCT. Accurate predictions were obtained with each program, indicated by root mean square distances: RMS_Dolphin = 1.8 ± 0.8 mm, RMS_ProPlan = 1.2 ± 0.4 mm, and RMS_PFEM = 1.3 ± 0.4 mm. Dolphin utilizes a landmark-based algorithm allowing for patient-specific bone-to-soft tissue ratios, which works well for cephalometric radiographs but has limited three-dimensional accuracy, whilst ProPlan and PFEM provide better three-dimensional predictions with continuous displacements. Patient or population-specific material properties can be defined in PFEM, while no soft tissue parameters are adjustable in ProPlan. Important clinical considerations are the topological differences between predictions due to the three algorithms, the non-negligible influence of the mismatch between planned and postoperative maxillary position, and the learning curve associated with sophisticated programs like PFEM.     

The proteome microenvironment determines the protective effect of preconditioning in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury

1. Download high-res image (341KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Lichen planus: a comprehensive evidence‐based analysis of medical treatment

Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic‐relapsing inflammatory skin disease. Although many drugs have been used for the management of LP, some of them lack the backup by strong therapeutic evidence, while others are not suitable for some patients due to safety profile issues. The aim of this study was to review the recent status of available medical therapies for LP to help physicians make better decisions upon best medical practice while facing patients with this condition. A review of published articles on management of LP was conducted with the MEDLINE and PubMed databases. The quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, low or very low. A total of 1366 articles were retrieved, and 219 (16%) were included in the final analysis. Twenty‐one different treatment modalities were analysed. The quality of evidence was high for topical steroid and calcineurin inhibitor, while it was moderate for oral steroids. All the other modalities reached low or very low quality of evidence. Topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors are the current first‐line therapies, while for other therapies the strength of recommendation is not so evident. Unfortunately, larger randomized, controlled trials to support the efficacy, safety and tolerability of other therapies in LP are lacking, and many of them are recommended based on studies with small sample sizes, lack of standardized outcome measures or lack of controlled duration or even in anecdotal evidence. Thus, large‐scale randomized clinical trials are still warranted to establish the exact benefits of other topical treatments, phototherapy, immunosuppressant and new immunomodulators for an optimized treatment of LP.