后腹腔镜肾根治性切除术中肾标本取出方法的探索

目的探讨一次性切口保护套在后腹腔镜肾根治性切除术中的应用及标本取出效率。方法回顾性分析本院2018年12月至2019年6月接受后腹腔镜肾根治性切除术的37例肾癌患者的临床资料。根据手术后标本取出体外的方法分为观察组(18例)和对照组(19例),观察组使用一次性切口保护套,对照组则使用传统自制标本袋;观察比较两组患者标本的取出时间和置入次数等指标。结果观察组与对照组的标本取出时间分别为(225.94±47.04)、(508.84±45.81)s,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组中有17例患者标本一次性顺利取出,1例因肿瘤较大,取出困难,经延长切口后顺利取出,所有标本完整均未破裂;对照组中有17例患者标本一次性顺利取出,另外2例患者经适当延长切口后取出,所有标本完整均未破裂。两组置入次数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后随访1年发现,所有患者均未出现癌细胞经手术切口种植转移的情况。结论在后腹腔镜肾根治性切除术中运用一次性切口保护套来辅助取标本,其手术时间短、操作简单,易上手,具有实用价值,值得临床推广应用。     

Differential Expression of PD-L1 Between Sporadic and VHL-Associated Hereditary Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Its Correlation With Clinicopathological Features

Background

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in several malignancies. However, the expression level and clinical significance of PD-L1 in von Hippel–Lindau (VHL)-associated hereditary clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remain unclear.

Protective role of histone deacetylase 4 from ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA lesions

Ultraviolet B (UVB) exposure is a core factor that leads to skin disease or carcinogenesis through the insufficient repair of DNA lesions. UVB-induced DNA lesions are mainly removed by the nucleotide excision repair (NER) mechanism. The expression of histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) is altered in the skin upon UVB exposure, indicating its possible implication in UVB-induced DNA lesions repair. Here, we investigated the role of HDAC4 in the NER removal of the main classes of UVB-induced DNA lesions consisting of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PPs). We found that UVB irradiation increased HDAC4 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels. HDAC4 interacted with NER factor XPC, which played an important role in effectively removing the UVB-induced DNA lesions. This study provides an understanding of the HDAC4 function in DNA repair, which will allow the development of efficient strategies to protect the skin from UVR-induced diseases.     

关于加强临床营养教育的若干建议

临床营养学作为一门重要的综合学科,已经成为临床治疗中重要的组成部分.临床营养教育是依靠临床营养学这门课程,为培养更加专业的临床营养学人才开展的一门新的教育课程.目前我国的临床营养学教育现状不容乐观,医学院校对临床营养学课程重视不够,在专业教学内容和课程建设方面均无法满足社会需求.通过借鉴国外营养教育制度,并结合国内临床营养人才需求现状,应注意不同专业的医学生在日后工作对临床营养的需求,逐渐开展临床营养学必修课教学,加强营养在临床应用的实践教学;并完善毕业后教育体系,对所有规范化培训的医师增加要求到临床营养科轮转培训且不少于1个月,对非临床医学的营养师要求到临床科室轮转至少2个月.提高进修临床医师继续教育及培训营养支持治疗的认识.临床营养专业的教学改革任重而道远,仍需我们不断完善理论体系,积极践行学科理论和知识,满足我国临床营养的人才需求,使社会认识到临床营养对促进健康、预防和治疗疾病的重要性.     

Bone age determination using only the index finger: a novel approach using a convolutional neural network compared with human radiologists

Background

Recently developed convolutional neural network (CNN) models determine bone age more accurately than radiologists.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a CNN and radiologists can accurately predict bone age from radiographs using only the index finger rather than the whole hand.

Materials and methods

We used a public anonymized dataset provided by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) pediatric bone age challenge. The dataset contains 12,611 hand radiographs for training and 200 radiographs for testing. The index finger was cropped from these images to create a second dataset. Separate CNN models were trained using the whole-hand radiographs and the cropped second-digit dataset using the consensus ground truth provided by the RSNA bone age challenge. Bone age determination using both models was compared with ground truth as provided by the RSNA dataset. Separately, three pediatric radiologists determined bone age from the whole-hand and index-finger radiographs, and the consensus was compared to the ground truth and CNN-model-determined bone ages.

Results

The mean absolute difference between the ground truth and CNN bone age for whole-hand and index-finger was similar (4.7 months vs. 5.1 months, P=0.14), and both values were significantly smaller than that for radiologist bone age determination from the single-finger radiographs (8.0 months, P<0.0001).

Conclusion

CNN-model-determined bone ages from index-finger radiographs are similar to whole-hand bone age interpreted by radiologists in the dataset, as well as a model trained on the whole-hand radiograph. In addition, the index-finger model performed better than the ground truth compared to subspecialty trained pediatric radiologists also using only the index finger to determine bone age. The radiologist interpreting bone age can use the second digit as a reliable starting point in their search pattern.

     

横断面研究能否进行因果推断

基于变量调查(或测量)的共时性、统计学关联及幸存者偏倚等原因,横断面研究被认为不能进行因果推断,这是当前的"共识"。本文基于因果思维,借助因果图,首先明确定义真实截面和测量截面,并识别截面概念仅存在于理论的特性。实际横断面研究中,测量变量的共时性并不存在,而是无一例外地表现为非共时性时序,其实质上相当于测量变量间互为独立性假设,或不存在有差别错分偏倚。类似于累积病例对照研究和历史性队列研究,横断面研究均为暴露和结局已存在或发生后进行的测量,这种测量相当于对变量值的历史重建或"考古"。这类研究进行因果推断的共性前提条件之一是,测量变量与其历史变量间必须存在着因果律。测量变量均为真实变量的替代者,测量变量间的时序在因果推断上并不重要。应加强对横断面研究分析性角色的认识。