Test–retest repeatability of [18F]Flortaucipir PET in Alzheimer’s disease and cognitively normal individuals

The aim of this study was to investigate the test–retest (TRT) repeatability of various parametric quantification methods for [¹⁸F]Flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET). We included eight subjects with dementia or mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease and six cognitively normal subjects. All underwent two 130-min dynamic [¹⁸F]Flortaucipir PET scans within 3 ± 1 weeks. Data were analyzed using reference region models receptor parametric mapping (RPM), simplified reference tissue method 2 (SRTM2) and reference logan (RLogan), as well as standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr, time intervals 40–60, 80–100 and 110–130 min post-injection) with cerebellar gray matter as reference region. We obtained distribution volume ratio or SUVr, first for all brain regions and then in three tau-specific regions-of-interest (ROIs). TRT repeatability (%) was defined as |retest–test|/(average (test + retest)) × 100. For all methods and across ROIs, TRT repeatability ranged from (median (IQR)) 0.84% (0.68–2.15) to 6.84% (2.99–11.50). TRT repeatability was good for all reference methods used, although semi-quantitative models (i.e. SUVr) performed marginally worse than quantitative models, for instance TRT repeatability of RPM: 1.98% (0.78–3.58) vs. SUVr_80–100: 3.05% (1.28–5.52), p < 0.001. Furthermore, for SUVr_80–100 and SUVr_110–130, with higher average SUVr, more variation was observed. In conclusion, while TRT repeatability was good for all models used, quantitative methods performed slightly better than semi-quantitative methods.     

Risk Factors and Hospitalization Costs of Dementia Patients: Examining Race and Gender Variations

Aims:

To examine the variation in risk factors and hospitalization costs among four elderly dementia cohorts by race and gender.

Materials and Methods:

The 2008 Tennessee Hospital Discharged database was examined. The prevalence, risk factors and cost of inpatient care of dementia were examined for individuals aged 65 years and above, across the four race gender cohorts - white males (WM), black males (BM), white females (WF), and black females (BF).

Results:

3.6% of patients hospitalized in 2008 had dementia. Dementia was higher among females than males, and higher among blacks than whites. Further, BF had higher prevalence of dementia than WF; similarly, BM had a higher prevalence of dementia than WM. Overall, six risk factors were associated with dementia for the entire sample including HTN, DM, CKD, CHF, COPD, and stroke. These risk factors varied slightly in predicting dementia by race and gender. Hospital costs were 14% higher among dementia patients compared to non-dementia patients.

Conclusions:

There exist significant race and gender disparities in prevalence of dementia. A greater degree of co-morbidity, increased duration of hospital stay, and more frequent hospitalizations, may result in a higher cost of inpatient dementia care. Aggressive management of risk factors may subsequently reduce stroke and cost of dementia care, especially in the black population. Race and gender dependent milestones for management of these risk factors should be considered.     

Multimodality Imaging of a Giant Right Coronary Artery Aneurysm

We describe a case of a 54-year-old woman who had a right cardiac mass found on coronary angiography. Echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging characterized it as a thrombosed giant right coronary artery aneurysm. This was confirmed on pathology. We present the role of multimodality cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis and characterization of a giant coronary artery aneurysm.     

Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio to detect absolute insulin deficiency in type 2 diabetes

BackgroundNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (CG87) recommend neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin for the provision of basal insulin in type 2 diabetes, but use of analogue insulin is as much as 40%. Where residual endogenous insulin secretory capacity is present there is no evidence that analogue insulins provide any additional benefit over human insulins, and they come at an expensive premium. Anecdotally, however, there is a reluctance to switch people back to NPH insulin, partly because of a perceived risk of pancreatic failure and potential ketosis. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) has been validated as a method for evaluating residual endogenous insulin secretion in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with a UCPCR of no more than 0·2 nmol/mmol suggestive of absolute insulin deficiency. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of true insulin deficiency among patients with type 2 diabetes with UCPCR, and confirm findings with the gold standard mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT).Methods191 insulin-treated patients with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (diagnosed at or after age 45 years and who did not start insulin within the first year of diagnosis) collected a 2-h post-prandial urine sample for UCPCR measurement. Nine patients from two subgroups (UCPCR ≤0·2 nmol/mmol and UCPCR >0·2) completed a standard MMTT.Findings11 (5·8%) of 191 patients had two consistent UCPCRs of less than or equal to 0·2 nmol/mmol. Nine were able to do the MMTT, of whom five were confirmed to have absolute insulin deficiency (stimulated serum c-peptide <0·2 nmol/L). Three of these five patients were glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody-negative. Nine of nine patients with UCPCR of more than 0·2 nmol/L had confirmed endogenous insulin secretion in their MMTT. Those with insulin deficiency had a shorter time to starting insulin (median 2·5 years [IQR 1·5–3·0] vs 6·0 [3·0–10·75], p=0·005) and lower body-mass index (25 kg/m² vs 29, p=0·04) but no other significant differences in clinical characteristics.InterpretationWe have demonstrated a very low prevalence of true pancreatic failure in this population of insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. This requires further exploration by comparison of a population being treated with NPH insulin with one on analogue insulin, and then determining whether UCPCR could act as a clinical decision support tool to safely switch from analogue insulin to NPH insulin.FundingNational Institute for Health Research.