RAR‐related orphan receptor A: One gene with multiple functions related to migraine

AimsRAR‐related orphan receptor (RORA) involves in regulation of several biological processes including inflammation and circadian rhythm that probably are involved in migraine pathophysiology. In the current study, the association between RORA rs11639084 and rs4774388 variants and susceptibility to migraine were investigated in a sample of Iranian migraine patients for the first time.MethodsIn a case‐control study including 400 participants, 200 migraineurs and 200 healthy controls, genotyping of RORA rs4774388 and rs11639084 polymorphisms was performed using tetra‐primer amplification refractory mutation system–polymerase chain reaction (TP‐ARMS‐PCR).ResultsThe distribution of rs4774388 C/T and T/T genotypes differed significantly between the studied groups. Moreover, an association was observed between rs4774388 and migraine under the recessive mode of inheritance (P = 0.002; OR = 1.89.; CI = 1.25‐2.87). The distribution of rs11639084 alleles and genotypes was not significantly different between migraineurs and healthy controls.ConclusionCurrent results suggest RORA, as a molecular link, may explain inflammation and circadian rhythm dysfunction in migraine. Further studies in different ethnicities are required to confirm the function of RORA in migraine development.     

Stroke in supplementary motor area mimicking functional disorder: a case report

Journal of Neurology - Supplementary motor area, the posterior third of the medial aspect of superior frontal gyrus, is known to be a heterogeneous area in function. It is involved in...     

Superior efficacy of co-targeting GFI1/KDM1A and BRD4 against AML and post-MPN secondary AML cells

There is an unmet need to overcome nongenetic therapy-resistance to improve outcomes in AML, especially post-myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) secondary (s) AML. Studies presented describe effects of genetic knockout, degradation or small molecule targeted-inhibition of GFI1/LSD1 on active enhancers, altering gene-expressions and inducing differentiation and lethality in AML and (MPN) sAML cells. A protein domain-focused CRISPR screen in LSD1 (KDM1A) inhibitor (i) treated AML cells, identified BRD4, MOZ, HDAC3 and DOT1L among the codependencies. Our findings demonstrate that co-targeting LSD1 and one of these co-dependencies exerted synergistic in vitro lethality in AML and post-MPN sAML cells. Co-treatment with LSD1i and the JAKi ruxolitinib was also synergistically lethal against post-MPN sAML cells. LSD1i pre-treatment induced GFI1, PU.1 and CEBPα but depleted c-Myc, overcoming nongenetic resistance to ruxolitinib, or to BETi in post-MPN sAML cells. Co-treatment with LSD1i and BETi or ruxolitinib exerted superior in vivo efficacy against post-MPN sAML cells. These findings highlight LSD1i-based combinations that merit testing for clinical efficacy, especially to overcome nongenetic therapy-resistance in AML and post-MPN sAML.Subject terms: Acute myeloid leukaemia, Targeted therapies     

Anesthetic Efficacy of Meperidine in Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Achieving adequate pulpal anesthesia in mandibular teeth is always a challenge. Supplementary injections and using drugs in combination are some methods implemented to overcome this hurdle. In this randomized clinical trial, use of meperidine in conjunction with lidocaine in intraligamentary injection did not exhibit significant improvement in anesthesia.Key Words: Periodontal ligament, Meperidine, Irreversible pulpitis, Dental anesthesiaThe failure rate of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in some experimental studies has been reported up to 75%.^1–4 This lack of success has even increased to a maximum of 81% in some recent studies.^5–7 To overcome this shortcoming, dental clinicians have actively sought measures to improve the patients'' anesthesia during different dental procedures. Apart from the anatomical variations mentioned in the applied anatomy of injections,⁸ several authors have attempted to modify the anesthetic technique,^9–12 and others have compared different anesthetic agents¹³ or their concentrations¹⁴ to improve their efficacy.Activating the opioid receptors peripherally in inflammatory conditions has become a new trend in research to manage postoperative pain.¹⁵ Synergy between local anesthetics and opioids has become an interesting field of research recently.¹⁶ Opioids are frequently added to local anesthetics in a variety of surgical procedures, eg, intrathecal application for minor surgery.¹⁷ Meperidine or its derivatives, eg, pethidine (meperidine chloride) or norpethidine (Pethidine Intermediate B) are agonists of μ-opioid receptors, which block the pathway of pain signals to the trigeminal nucleus. They also activate peripheral opioid receptors and block sodium channels.^17–22 Despite controversy regarding the use of meperidine as an anesthetic,²² recent studies have demonstrated its benefits over prilocaine in arthroscopy with local anesthesia,¹⁶ nasal packing removal,²³ etc.However, only a few studies have investigated the dental anesthetic efficacy of such combinations.^24,25 The effect of the addition of meperidine to lidocaine in IANB for pain management in normal teeth²⁴ and also in teeth with irreversible pulpitis²⁵ has been studied. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of local anesthetics with and without meperidine for intraligamentary supplemental injection for teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Our null hypothesis stated that the addition of meperidine to standard lidocaine with epinephrine does not improve the efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary anesthesia in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The specific objectives were to randomly allocate volunteers with complete soft tissue anesthesia following an IANB, yet having positive pulp response, into 2 groups, and then compare the efficacy of lidocaine with epinephrine plus meperidine with that of lidocaine with epinephrine plus an equal volume of sterile water for supplemental periodontal ligament anesthesia.     

The effects of loading time on osseointegration and new bone formation around dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs

BACKGROUND: Immediate loading of dental implants has been introduced as a method of reducing implant treatment time without compromising its prognosis. In this research, the effects of loading time on the amount of bone-to-implant contact and bone formation around dental implants were evaluated histologically. METHODS: Three months prior to implantation, the lower premolar teeth of 15 dogs were extracted. Three or four dental implants were placed in the healed extraction sites for each dog (N = 48). Dividing the dogs into three groups, the implants were either loaded 48 hours or 1 week later with metallic or prefabricated acrylic crowns or were left unloaded until the time of sacrifice. Three months after implant insertion, the animals were sacrificed and samples were investigated to define the amount of bone-to-implant contact, lamellar and woven bone percentage, and local inflammation of the newly formed bone. RESULTS: No significant difference in the observed criteria was reported among the three groups (P >0.05); however, the unloaded group had the highest degree of bone-to-implant contact and the group loaded 48 hours after the primary implant insertion had the least. The prosthesis type had no significant effect on the implant success rate (P >0.05). The lamellar and woven bone percentage of newly formed bone also did not differ in the three groups (P >0.05). One implant from each group failed in this study. CONCLUSION: Loading time does not seem to significantly affect the degree of osseointegration and bone-to-implant contact and the composition of newly formed bone around dental implants.     

The Effect of a Constant Electrical Field on Osseointegration after Immediate Implantation in Dog Mandibles: A Preliminary Study

PURPOSE: The long time span between insertion of implants and functional rehabilitation often inconveniences patients. Accelerating bone growth around dental implants can shorten this time span. This in vivo study evaluated the effect of a constant electrical field on bone growth around dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four mongrel dogs were used in this study. Sixteen dental implants were placed immediately after extraction of the first premolar and molar teeth. A constant electrical field (CEF) generator was placed in the mucoperiostal pouch created from the subperiostral dissection under the inferior border of the dog's mandible and connected to the experiment side fixtures. CEF provided 3 V of electrical potential during osseointegration. Histologic sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and observed under light microscopy. The sections were analyzed histomorphometrically to calculate the amount of newly formed bone. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 11.0 computer software (alpha= 0.05). RESULTS: At the end of the first stage of the osseointegration (90 days) CEF group sections showed enhanced growth of the trabeculae compared with the control group. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between experimental and control groups. Bone contact ratio was statistically significant in the experimental group (p= 0.001). An increase in the local bone formation and bone contact ratio was observed with direct electrical stimulation of the implant and the bone area around the implant. CONCLUSION: Minimal direct electrical current, which can produce an electrical field around the implant, can increase the amount of bone formation and decrease the time of osseointegration.     

Acid and Microhardness of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate–like Materials

Introduction

The aim of this study was to compare the surface microhardness of BioAggregate, ProRoot MTA, and CEM Cement when exposed to an acidic environment or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a synthetic tissue fluid.

Methods

Ninety cylindrical molds made of polymethyl methacrylate with an internal diameter of 6 mm and height of 4 mm (according to ASTM E384 standard for microhardness tests) were fabricated and filled with BioAggregate (n = 30), tooth-colored ProRoot MTA (n = 30), or CEM Cement (n = 30). Each group was then divided into 3 subgroups of 10 specimens consisting of those exposed to distilled water, exposed to PBS (pH = 7.4), or exposed to butyric acid (pH = 5.4). After 1 week the Vickers surface microhardness test was performed. Statistical analysis included 2-way analysis of variance, followed by post hoc Dunnett T3 in cases with lack of homoscedasticity and Tukey honestly significant difference in cases with homoscedasticity.

Results

The indentations obtained from the CEM Cement specimens exposed to an acidic pH were not readable because of incomplete setting. There was a significant difference between the microhardness of the materials regardless of the environmental conditions (P < .001). In all the environmental conditions, MTA had significantly higher and CEM Cement had significantly lower microhardness values (P < .001). All experimental cements had significantly higher microhardness values when exposed to PBS (P < .001) and had significantly lower microhardness values when exposed to butyric acid (P < .001).

Conclusions

The surface microhardness of BioAggregate, ProRoot MTA, and CEM Cement was reduced significantly by exposure to butyric acid and increased significantly by exposure to PBS. In all environmental conditions, MTA had significantly higher microhardness values.