First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore

INTRODUCTIONRecent studies reported that laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is associated with superior perioperative outcomes compared to the open approach. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of LPD, especially during the learning phase. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been reported to be associated with a shorter learning curve compared to LPD. We herein present our initial experience with RPD.METHODSA retrospective review of a single-institution prospective robotic hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery database of 70 patients identified seven consecutive RPDs performed by a single surgeon in 2016–2017. These were matched at a 1:2 ratio with 14 open pancreatoduodenectomies (OPDs) selected from 77 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies performed by the same surgeon between 2011 and 2017.RESULTSSeven patients underwent RPD, of which five were hybrid procedures with open reconstruction. There were no open conversions. Median operative time was 710.0 (range 560.0–930.0) minutes. Two major morbidities (> Grade 2) occurred: one gastrojejunostomy bleed requiring endoscopic haemostasis and one delayed gastric emptying requiring feeding tube placement. There were no pancreatic fistulas, reoperations or 90-day/in-hospital mortalities in the RPD group. Comparison between RPD and OPD demonstrated that RPD was associated with a significantly longer operative time. Compared to open surgery, there was no significant difference in estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative stay, pancreatic fistula rates, morbidity and mortality rates, R0 resection rates, and lymph node harvest rates.CONCLUSIONOur initial experience demonstrates that RPD is feasible and safe in selected patients. It can be safely adopted without any compromise in patient outcomes compared to the open approach.     

Guidelines for setting up an external quality assessment scheme for blood smear interpretation. Part II: survey preparation, statistical evaluation and reporting.

Blood smear analysis is a well-known technique in medical laboratories. The clinical relevance of this analysis and its interpretation are very important. Consequently, monitoring of laboratory performance by an external quality assessment scheme is strongly recommended. This article represents a very practical guidance document for External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) organizers for setting up blood smear schemes. In the first part of the guidelines, the Hematology Working Group of the European External Committee for External Quality Assurance Programmes in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) published practical information for the preparation of blood smears for use in an EQAS. Part II focuses on aspects such as survey preparation, statistical evaluation and reporting, and describes particular details for organizing blood morphology EQA surveys by means of virtual microscopy.     

Guidelines for blood smear preparation and staining procedure for setting up an external quality assessment scheme for blood smear interpretation. Part I: Control material.

Blood smear analysis is a well known technique in medical laboratories. Clinical relevance of this analysis and its interpretation are very important. Consequently, monitoring of laboratory performance by an external quality assessment scheme is strongly recommended. Most starting external quality organizers set up a scheme for clinical chemistry. Due to a lack of guidance documents, many organizers are reluctant to offer a hematology scheme. This article aims to be a very practical guidance document for external quality assessment organizers for the set up of blood smear schemes.     

Thrombosis in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical setting, procoagulant profile and factor V Leiden

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have an increased frequency of thromboembolism, and microvascular thrombosis has been proposed as a contributory pathogenic factor. The mechanism of enhanced procoagulant activity is not understood. We examined the clinical setting of thromboembolic events in 52 patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, and assessed the procoagulant laboratory profile, including Factor V Leiden, in a subset of 20 patients to identify procoagulant risk factors. Patients who developed thrombosis tended to be young; 60% of thrombotic events occurred in patients under 50 years. Multiple thromboembolic episodes occurred in 13% and unusual sites of thrombosis (e.g. intracardiac, cerebral, inominate veins) in 11%. No risk factor was identifiable in 52% of cases and two-thirds of thromboses occurred in an out-patient setting. The mortality rate was 8%. Evidence for inflammatory disease activity was found in only 45% of patients with ulcerative colitis at the time of the thromboembolic event, in contrast to 89% of those with Crohn's disease. Assays for specific coagulation defects were negative in all cases tested (protein S, C were normal in 17/17; anti-thrombin III, anti-phospholipid antibodies and activated protein C resistance were negative in 20/20, and only 1/20 patients was found to be heterozygous for Factor V leiden. Thrombosis in inflammatory bowel disease is important because it occurs in a young population, often in unusual sites, and has a high mortality. The development of thrombosis is related to active inflammatory disease in most patients with Crohn's disease but apparently not in those with ulcerative colitis. Since approximately half of the patients had no other identifiable risk factor, there remains a substantial group of patients with IBD who develop thrombosis for unknown reasons.      

Assessment of mycophenolic acid-induced immunosuppression: a new approach

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid (MPA), a metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), is an immunosuppressive agent that inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), a key enzyme in the ex novo synthesis of GTP. We measured IMPDH activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from MMF-treated patients to evaluate the efficacy of MMF in individual patients. METHODS: IMPDH activity was measured by (3)H released from [2,8-(3)H]IMP that had been formed in the cells from added [2,8-(3)H]hypoxanthine in PBMCs of 35 renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporin A and corticoids plus MMF: 2 g (n = 10), 1.5 g (n = 7), 1 g (n = 10), or 0 g (n = 8) per day. An alternative method, based on the capacity of the patients' sera to inhibit spontaneous proliferation of the CEM cell line, was also analyzed. RESULTS: The IMPDH activity of PBMCs in transplanted patients was highly variable. For the method based on CEM cell line proliferation: (a) cell proliferation was inhibited only in MMF-treated patients; (b) there was a clear postdose increase in inhibition; (c) inhibition was not affected by other immunosuppressants in vitro or in vivo; (d) inhibition from predose to predose sample was correlated; and (e) when the MMF dosage was <20 mg. kg(-1). day(-1), two groups of patients were identified, one that maintained a high inhibitory capacity in all dose intervals, and one with periods of low inhibitory capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the inhibition of CEM cell line proliferation by sera from MMF-treated patients may be useful for evaluating the relative efficacy of MMF treatment in individual patients, especially those receiving low doses of MMF.     

Programa de atención farmacéutica integrada en pacientes con enfermedades crónicas

ObjectivesTo assess whether an integrated pharmaceutical care programme (IPCP) improves clinical evolution, patient quality of life, and reduces health costs in chronic patients.Material and methodsA parallel, open, and multi-centre clinical trial of an IPCP in patients with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 8 different health areas in Cataluña. The intervened patient was monitored for pharmacotherapeutic evolution by hospital pharmacists, primary care physicians, and community pharmacists. Controls received normal follow-up. All patients were monitored for 12 months, with quality of life tests administered at the beginning and end of follow-up.ResultsWe had the participation of 8 different hospitals, 8 primary care centres, and 109 community pharmacies. 238 patients completed the study, with 2.9% of participants lost during the study period. There were no significant differences in terms of readmissions, visits to the doctors, or to emergency services. We detected 50 different medication-related problems (MRP) in 37 patients, with a statistically significant difference in terms of MRP between the control and treatment groups of patients with HF, and almost significant differences in COPD patients. MRP were moderate-severe in 36% of cases. MRP were avoidable in 94% of cases, and the pharmacist resolved the issue in 90% of cases. There were no differences in terms of patient quality of life or health costs between the start and end of the study.ConclusionsIntegrated pharmaceutical care programs facilitate an improvement in the quality of patient care, but electronic registries are necessary to promote communication between sections of the health care network.