Evaluierung der NEF-Fehl- und Übergabeeinsätze im Raum Innsbruck

Die Anaesthesiologie - Die Qualität eines Rettungssystems zeichnet sich auch durch den effizienten Einsatz seiner personellen und Fahrzeugressourcen aus. So können im berechtigten Fall...     

„Gesagt ist nicht gehört,gehört ist nicht verstanden“ – Therapiezieleinschätzung aus Sicht von PatientInnen in der Radiologie

Die Onkologie - Trotz Aufklärungsgespräch durch den behandelnden Arzt wird häufig eine große Diskrepanz hinsichtlich der Therapiezieleinschätzung zwischen Arzt- und...     

Neuropsychological Profile in Children with Posterior Fossa Tumors with or Without Postoperative Cerebellar Mutism Syndrome (CMS)

Cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS) is a common surgical sequela in children following posterior fossa tumor (PFT) resection. Here, we analyze the neuropsychological features associated with PFT in children, focusing particularly on the differential profiles associated with the presence or absence of CMS after surgery. We further examine the effect of post-resection treatments, tumor type, and presence/absence of hydrocephalus on surgical outcome. Thirty-six patients diagnosed with PFT (19 with and 17 without CMS) and 34 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. A comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation was conducted in all patients postoperatively and in HCs, including an assessment of general cognitive ability, motor skills, perception, language, memory, attention, executive functions, and academic competence. CMS was found to be a clinical marker of lower neuropsychological profile scores across all cognitive domains except auditory-verbal processing and visual memory tasks. PFT patients not presenting CMS exhibited milder impairment in intellectual functioning, motor tasks, reasoning, language, verbal learning and recall, attention, cognitive executive functions, and academic competence. High-grade tumors were associated with slower processing speed and verbal delayed recall as well as alterations in selective and sustained attention. Hydrocephalus was detrimental to motor functioning and nonverbal reasoning. Patients who had undergone surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy presented impaired processing speed, verbal learning, and reading. In addition to the deleterious effects of PFT, post-resection PFT treatments have a negative cognitive impact. These undesired consequences and the associated tumor-related damage can be assessed using standardized, long-term neuropsychological evaluation when planning rehabilitation.     

Riesgo de recurrencia tras retirada de la anticoagulación en pacientes con enfermedad tromboembólica venosa no provocada: validación externa del nomograma de Viena y del modelo predictivo DASH

IntroductionScales for predicting venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence are useful for deciding the duration of the anticoagulant treatment. Although there are several scales, the most appropriate for our setting has not been identified. For this reason, we aimed to validate the DASH prediction score and the Vienna nomogram at 12 months.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of unselected consecutive VTE patients seen between 2006 and 2014. We compared the ability of the DASH score and the Vienna nomogram to predict recurrences of VTE. The validation was performed by stratifying patients as low-risk or high-risk, according to each scale (discrimination) and comparing the observed recurrence with the expected rate (calibration).ResultsOf 353 patients evaluated, 195 were analyzed, with an average age of 53.5 ± 19 years. There were 21 recurrences in 1 year (10.8%, 95% CI: 6.8%-16%). According to the DASH score, 42% were classified as low risk, and the rate of VTE recurrence in this group was 4.9% (95% CI: 1.3%-12%) vs. the high-risk group that was 15% (95% CI: 9%-23%) (p <.05). According to the Vienna nomogram, 30% were classified as low risk, and the rate of VTE recurrence in the low risk group vs. the high risk group was 4.2% (95% CI:0.5%-14%) vs. 16.2% (95% CI: 9.9%-24.4%) (p <.05).ConclusionsOur study validates the DASH score and the Vienna nomogram in our population. The DASH prediction score may be the most advisable, both because of its simplicity and its ability to identify more low-risk patients than the Vienna nomogram (42% vs. 30%).