Phase I Study of Afatinib and Selumetinib in Patients with KRAS-Mutated Colorectal,Non-Small Cell Lung,and Pancreatic Cancer

Lessons Learned

• Afatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent dosing schedules, albeit at lower doses than approved for monotherapy.
• Maximum tolerated dose for continuous and intermittent schedules is afatinib 20 mg once daily and selumetinib 25 mg b.i.d.
• Because the anticancer activity was limited, further development of this combination is not recommended until better biomarkers for response and resistance are defined.

BackgroundAntitumor effects of MEK inhibitors are limited in KRAS‐mutated tumors because of feedback activation of upstream epidermal growth factor receptors, which reactivates the MAPK and the phosphoinositide 3‐kinase–AKT pathway. Therefore, this phase I trial was initiated with the pan‐HER inhibitor afatinib plus the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in patients with KRAS mutant, PIK3CA wild‐type tumors.MethodsAfatinib and selumetinib were administered according to a 3+3 design in continuous and intermittent schedules. The primary objective was safety, and the secondary objective was clinical efficacy.ResultsTwenty‐six patients were enrolled with colorectal cancer (n = 19), non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 6), and pancreatic cancer (n = 1). Dose‐limiting toxicities occurred in six patients, including grade 3 diarrhea, dehydration, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 20 mg afatinib once daily (QD) and 25 mg selumetinib b.i.d. (21 days on/7 days off) for continuous afatinib dosing and for intermittent dosing with both drugs 5 days on/2 days off. Efficacy was limited with disease stabilization for 221 days in a patient with NSCLC as best response.ConclusionAfatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent schedules in patients with KRAS mutant tumors. Although target engagement was observed, the clinical efficacy was limited.     

Reproduction patterns among classical Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with BEACOPP and ABVD in Sweden,Denmark and Norway—A population-based matched cohort study

Childbirth rates in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) survivors have historically been reduced compared to the general population. Understanding if contemporary treatment protocols are associated with reduced fertility is crucial as treatment guidelines shift toward more liberal use of intensive chemotherapy. We identified 2834 individuals aged 18-40 years with cHL in Swedish and Danish lymphoma registers, and in the clinical database at Oslo University Hospital diagnosed 1995-2018, who were linked to national medical birth registers. Cox regression adjusted for stage, performance status, year, and age at diagnosis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) contrasting time to first childbirth by treatment groups (ABVD, 2-4 BEACOPP, 6-8 BEACOPP) up to 10 years after diagnosis. Overall, 74.8% of patients were treated with ABVD, 3.1% with 2-4 BEACOPP and 11.2% with 6-8 BEACOPP. Adjusted HRs comparing childbirth rates in individuals treated with 6-8 BEACOPP, and 2-4 BEACOPP to ABVD were 0.53 (CI: 0.36-0.77) and 0.33 (CI: 0.12-0.91) for males, and 0.91 (CI: 0.61-1.34) and 0.38 (CI: 0.12-1.21) for females. Cumulative incidence of childbirths after 10 years was 19.8% (CI: 14.5%-27.0%) for males and 34.3% (CI: 25.8%-45.6%) for females treated with 6-8 BEACOPP. Proportions of children born after assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatments were 77.4% (CI: 60.2-88.6%) for males following 6-8 BEACOPP, and <11% for females. Among ABVD treated patients the corresponding proportions were 12.2% (CI: 8.5%-17.3%) and 10.6% (CI: 7.4%-14.9%). BEACOPP treatment is associated with decreased childbirth rates compared to ABVD in male, but not female, cHL patients, despite widespread access to ART in the Nordics.     

The significance of early breastfeeding experiences on breastfeeding self‐efficacy one week postpartum

Many new mothers do not reach their breastfeeding goals. Breastfeeding self‐efficacy is a modifiable determinant influenced by prior and new breastfeeding experiences. More knowledge about factors associated with early breastfeeding experiences and breastfeeding self‐efficacy would allow us to qualify breastfeeding counselling and increase breastfeeding duration. This study aimed to identify prevalence and factors associated with early negative breastfeeding experience, low breastfeeding self‐efficacy in the first week postpartum, and drop in self‐efficacy from late pregnancy to early postpartum period. A prospective longitudinal study was performed in Denmark from 2013 to 2014, including 2, 804 mothers. Results showed that 1 week postpartum almost 10% of mothers had negative breastfeeding experiences, 36% had low breastfeeding self‐efficacy, and 26% drop in self‐efficacy from pregnancy. Negative breastfeeding experiences were significantly associated with epidural analgesia, interrupted skin‐to‐skin contact immediately postpartum, short previous breastfeeding duration, and lacking social support. Low breastfeeding self‐efficacy was associated with low breastfeeding intention, short previous breastfeeding duration, and negative breastfeeding experiences in the first week postpartum. Finally, significant associations of drop in breastfeeding self‐efficacy from late pregnancy were no or short education, early negative breastfeeding experiences, prior short breastfeeding duration, and low general breastfeeding self‐efficacy in pregnancy. Negative breastfeeding experiences in the first week postpartum is crucial for maternal breastfeeding self‐efficacy 1 week following birth. It is important to identify and support mothers at risk of negative breastfeeding experiences in the first week following birth and address factors that might increase the probability of early successful breastfeeding experiences.     

Can MRI differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors and high-grade chondrosarcoma? A systematic review

Background and purpose — Adequate staging of chondroid tumors at diagnosis is important as it determines both treatment and outcome. This systematic review provides an overview of MRI criteria used to differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACT) and high-grade chondrosarcoma (HGCS).Patients and methods — For this systematic review PubMed and Embase were searched, from inception of the databases to July 12, 2018. All original articles describing MRI characteristics of pathologically proven primary central chondrosarcoma and ACT were included. A quality appraisal of the included papers was performed. Data on MRI characteristics and histological grade were extracted by 2 reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed if possible. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018067959.Results — Our search identified 2,132 unique records, of which 14 studies were included. 239 ACT and 140 HGCS were identified. The quality assessment showed great variability in consensus criteria used for both pathologic and radiologic diagnosis. Due to substantial heterogeneity we refrained from pooling the results in a meta-analysis and reported non-statistical syntheses. Loss of entrapped fatty marrow, cortical breakthrough, and extraosseous soft tissue expansion appeared to be present more often in HGCS compared with ACT.Interpretation — This systematic review provides an overview of MRI characteristics used to differentiate between ACT and HGCS. Future studies are needed to develop and assess more reliable imaging methods and/or features to differentiate ACT from HGCS.

The incidence of chondrosarcoma of bone appears to have been increasing during the last decade and is now reported to be the most common primary malignant bone tumor in several countries (Thorkildsen et al. 2018, van Praag et al. 2018). Conventional chondrosarcoma is the most common subtype of chondrosarcoma. Other subtypes of chondrosarcoma (e.g., juxtacortical, mesenchymal, or secondary chondrosarcoma) are rare and show different radiologic appearance and clinical behavior (Bindiganavile et al. 2015).Conventional chondrosarcoma is classified into the histological grades 1 (currently known as atypical cartilaginous tumor [ACT]), 2, and 3. The metastatic potential, and therefore the disease-specific survival, correlates with the histological grade (Fletcher et al. 2013, Laitinen et al. 2018, Thorkildsen et al. 2018). ACTs rarely metastasize and are therefore reclassified as an intermediate type of tumor, not a malignancy (Fletcher et al. 2013). Due to the increase in patients undergoing MRI examinations for joint-related complaints, the incidental detection of ACT has increased substantially (van Praag et al. 2018).With the increasing incidence of ACT, clear radiologic criteria to differentiate ACT from high-grade chondrosarcoma (i.e., grades 2 and 3) become more and more important. Adequate staging of chondroid tumors at diagnosis is important as it determines both treatment and prognosis. High-grade chondrosarcomas behave aggressively. Between 10% and 30% of grade 2 and about 70% of grade 3 chondrosarcomas metastasize (Evans et al. 1977). Hence, high-grade chondrosarcoma (HGCS) requires wide en bloc resection with free surgical margins. In contrast, ACTs are intermediate tumors and can be treated either with intralesional curettage and local adjuvant or nonoperatively with regular follow-up when located in the long bones (Deckers et al. 2016).Due to the heterogenous composition of chondroid tumors, diagnostic biopsy is unreliable in assessing the genuine histological grade and malignant potential of chondrosarcomas (Laitinen et al. 2018). Therefore, physicians need to rely on imaging and clinical findings (e.g., pain is more common in HGCS) to differentiate ACT from HGCS. Imaging evaluation of cartilaginous and other bone tumors is generally based on multimodal assessment including at least conventional radiography and MRI (Nascimento et al. 2014).During the most recent decades research has focused mainly on differentiating enchondroma from chondrosarcoma (Choi et al. 2013, Douis et al. 2014, Crim et al. 2015, Lisson et al. 2018). New insights have shown that both enchondroma and ACT located in the long bones can be observed without treatment (Deckers et al. 2016, Sampath Kumar et al. 2016, Chung et al. 2018). These insights make the differentiation between ACT and HGCS clinically relevant. Currently, literature on differentiating ACT from HGCS is sparse and clear radiologic criteria are lacking. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to provide an overview of MRI characteristics used to date to differentiate between ACT and HGCS.     

Patient-reported burden of intensified surveillance and surgery in high-risk individuals under pancreatic cancer surveillance

Familial Cancer - In high-risk individuals participating in a pancreatic cancer surveillance program, worrisome features warrant for intensified surveillance or, occasionally, surgery. Our...