Shoulder and elbow pain in junior high school baseball players: Results of a nationwide survey

BackgroundDespite proposals and guidelines to prevent baseball injuries in young players by societies and organizations, many shoulder and elbow injuries continue to occur among junior high school baseball players. In order to investigate the training conditions of junior high school baseball players and the risk factors for shoulder and elbow pain in the players, we conducted a questionnaire survey among junior high school baseball players throughout the country.MethodsThe questionnaire survey was conducted among junior high school baseball players in September 2016.ResultsA total of 11,134 junior high school baseball players belonging to 495 teams responded to the survey. Among these, 4004 players trained every day of the week and 1151 players played baseball games every month with no off-season. Among 9752 players who did not have shoulder and/or elbow pain in the spring and summer of 2015, 19.2% of players experienced elbow pain over the course of one year, 13.6% of players experienced shoulder pain, and 28.0% complained of shoulder and/or elbow pain. The frequency of elbow pain was more than that of shoulder pain. At risk for shoulder pain were pitchers and catchers and second-year students, while risk factors for elbow pain were playing pitcher and catcher positions, pitching or throwing ≥300 balls per week, playing ≥10 games on average per month and being left-handed.ConclusionRisk factors for shoulder pain were different from those for elbow pain. To prevent elbow pain, coaches should pay attention to pitchers and catchers and left-handed players and not allow players to pitch or throw ≥300 full-power balls per week or participate in ≥10 games per month. They should also pay attention to pitchers and catchers and second-year students to prevent shoulder pain. It is important for coaches to train multiple pitchers and catchers.     

Rapid decrease in serum VEGF-A levels may be a worse prognostic biomarker for patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab and gemcitabine

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between changes in the levels of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) after treatment with bevacizumab and gemcitabine (Bev-Gem) and the clinical outcome. Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients treated with Bev-Gem therapy at our hospital between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Serum VEGF levels at the first and second treatment cycle were measured by ELISA. All patients were categorized into two groups—patients with > 50% decrease in serum VEGF-A levels (Group A) and patients with < 50% decrease serum VEGF-A levels (Group B). The association between clinical outcome and serum VEGF levels was investigated between the two groups. Among 18 patients, 10 were in Group A and 8 in Group B. Group A exhibited a lower response rate (0% vs.75% p < 0.01) and clinical benefit rate (60% vs.100% p = 0.02) than Group B. The median serum VEGF-A level of Group A before the first cycle of Bev-Gem therapy was higher than that in Group B (61.2 vs. 3.7 pg/mL, p < 0.01). Group A exhibited worse PFS (7 vs., 10 months, p < 0.01) and OS (17 vs. 26 months, p = 0.04) than Group B. There were more patients with > 10% increase in serum VEGF-B levels in Group A than in Group B (p < 0.01). The rapid decrease in VEGF-A levels and the resultant increase in serum VEGF-B levels might be associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome. Large-scale studies are needed to further examine these results.     

Identification of intracerebral hemorrhage in the early-phase of MM1+2C-type sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: A case report

We report a case of early-phase sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (sCJD) complicated by intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), classified as MM1 + 2C-type based on autopsy. A 61-year-old Japanese man presented to our hospital with speaking difficulties including repeated usage of the same words. He was hospitalized on the seventh day after symptom onset, and diffusion-weighted images on magnetic resonance imaging showed hyperintense regions in the frontal cortex and caudate nucleus. On the 11th day after symptom onset, head computed tomography revealed ICH in the right occipital and parietal lobes. Routine laboratory evaluations and angiography revealed no cause of ICH. Myoclonus of the extremities and drowsiness were observed on the 15th day after symptom onset. He reached the state of akinetic mutism approximately two months after symptom onset. The cerebrospinal fluid test revealed positive real-time quaking-induced conversion and 14-3-3 protein. Electroencephalography revealed periodic sharp wave complexes. A clinical diagnosis of probable Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease was made according to the diagnostic criteria. After a relapse of pneumonia, he passed away on the 103rd day after symptom onset. Postmortem examination revealed ICH in the right posterior cingulate gyrus. No pathological change that might have caused ICH was obtained. Although the effect of sCJD on the onset of ICH is undeniable, the cause of ICH was unknown. Prion protein immunohistochemistry revealed the following results: (1) weak synaptic-type deposits in the tissue rarefacted by ICH; (2) synaptic-type deposits in the cerebral cortex, which showed fine vacuoles; and (3) perivacuolar-type deposits in the inferior temporal gyrus and lingual gyrus, which showed frequent large confluent vacuoles. Although it could be considered MM1-type sCJD clinically, this case was neuropathologically diagnosed as having MM1 + 2C-type sCJD. It was shown that ICH may occur in early-phase sCJD. To improve sCJD prognosis, treatment of complications and careful follow up are important. Furthermore, pathological diagnosis is indispensable for sCJD type diagnosis.